Mothering › Forums › Pregnancy and Birth › I'm Pregnant › Talking about midwifery with non-pregnant "traditional" friends
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Talking about midwifery with non-pregnant "traditional" friends

post #1 of 19
Thread Starter 
I grew up surrounded by kids. Someone was always pregnant or having a baby, and it always seemed normal. But I initially became interested in midwifery around the time DH and I started talking about TTC. I did what I always do: I read a book to learn some more. That one book made me reach for another, and another... and a "convert" was born.

It took some time (and statistics) to convince DH that I hadn't entirely lost my mind. Now he's Rebel With a Cause, lol. A bunch of our friends are considering TTC, and some of them will casually ask why we're going with a mw. But I feel like DH alienates them by going off on the evils of our system. I want to interest people w/o scaring them. How do you talk to your non-pregnant, "traditional" friends about your midwife, doula, or Bradley class?
post #2 of 19
I have a neighbor... shes not actually considering TTC (she has two with her tubes tied... though she has admitted to considering a reversal for one more, eventually)

She has been asking me a LOT about it. (this is specifically about doing a homebirth, mind you!)

Ive found the best way to not look like I am crazy is to explain that

1. all emergency medical supplies for the most common emergencies will be on hand. For example, she has pitocin, methergine and a few other things in the case of a maternal hemorrhage (granted we try nipple stim. and herbs first buuuuuut I didn't feel the need to mention THAT lol)... and oxygen in case baby needs it.

2. an emergency c-section is rarely so much of an emergency that the 15 minutes it takes us to transfer to the hospital is going to make a difference (especially since so many so-called emergency c-sections are neither an emergency nor really required a c-section... though by far I am not saying all fit into that category and some are very much necessary to save the mother and/or child's life)

3. I have already been ruled out of a majority of problems that would make a homebirth unsafe (placenta previa, pre-e, etc.)

4. You know how horrible you feel postpartum (or to those just starting to TTC... you have no clue how horrible you are going to feel postpartum but...) being in your own bed right after you deliver is probably the only thing you could wish for after a healthy uneventful hospital birth. Id rather not have to wish for anything at all.



For the others, such as my soon-to-be sister-in-law I just point them toward the Business of Being Born... although it does focus on the evils of the medical establishment, I appreciate that it makes clear that sometimes its better to go to a doctor. Sometimes moms are at risk and require that special level of care... but if you are not at risk many will all too often try to find something to make you at risk.

If I were doing a hospital birth with a midwife pretty much all I would have to say is -

I am not sick. Pregnancy is not an illness. I would rather go to someone who understands that and treats the birth as what it is, the beginning of a new life, rather than what you tend to get with most doctors, an emergency situation.
post #3 of 19
That last paragraph is where I start.

Pregnacy is not inherently a medical issue so I don't feel it needs a Person chomping at the bit with a medical solution. If a medical situation were to arise, I will have picked a midwife that is good at recognizing it, being capable and well set up to deal with routine issues and honest with her limits.
She will work hand in hand with me decide when or if we need more help to address things. I feel a good midwife will see me as a partner and a driving force in my own experience, I feel too many doctors will see me as a issue to deal with and person the have to get around to do what is best for them or just a rule of their work environment.
post #4 of 19
I agree with the previous posters, but also, I currently have a midwife and will give birth in a birth center (homebirth is not for us for a number of reasons). My daughter's birth was an unmedicated, very hands off birth in the same birth center with an OB who was VERY non-interventionist (who sadly left the area). I had no IV, intermittent monitoring, etc. etc.....

Anyways, I would be turned off by anyone, man or woman, who went off on the "evils" of the system. Because people can have all the same information, be completely educated, and STILL make a completely different decision based on what is right for them and what makes them feel comfortable. I don't like it when people assume ignorance just because people make different decisions (not that I am saying this is what your husband is doing).

If people ask about why you are choosing midwifery, I would stay away from framing your response in the context of why the medical model is "evil" and more about why the midwifery model works better for you, based on the things about it you like, instead of why there are things about the medical model that you don't like.
post #5 of 19
I mostly point out why I like it - I don't want to check into the hospital while in labour if I can help it, I don't want to stay in the hospital, I want to mostly see someone I know (my doctor only turns up for the actual birth, the rest is handled via telephone by the nurses) and I don't like hospitals. Not because they are horrible dens of evil, just because I don't like them. Never have.

Also, the gov't here pays for it, which helps keep people from thinking that you are crazy.
post #6 of 19
I'm a big believer in answering questions as they come up. Not launching into lectures. I'd definitely have a chat with dh about canning his Evils of the System routine. Catch more flies with honey, etc.
post #7 of 19
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by zinemama View Post
I'm a big believer in answering questions as they come up. Not launching into lectures. I'd definitely have a chat with dh about canning his Evils of the System routine. Catch more flies with honey, etc.
I mentioned this to him last night. He's a teacher, and I told him that I think he forgets that our friends aren't his students. He can't take on that didactic, lecturing tone and expect anyone to listen. And we don't have all the answers - this is our first baby. He was receptive to what I said (I don't think he realized he was doing it, despite my kicking him under the table) but didn't know what to say instead.

Men. {{insert deep sigh here}}.
post #8 of 19
I don't have a midwife (financial reasons) but some of the perks for me are that its more about me. Appointments with midwives are generally longer and cover more than just the physical aspects of pregnancy. I wouldn't get rushed through my appointments (or wait in tremendously long lines) either since midwives take on less patients than OBs. Another huge plus I see is that the midwife is actually THERE for the labor. I would feel safer knowing that my caregiver was actually present and alert to how things were going. If then there WERE an emergency she would know about it and be able to act immediately. If something happens in a hospital how long does it REALLY take for a doctor to get there?
post #9 of 19
I just said, "I'm having the baby with such-and-such midwife." Didn't even mention homebirth. Answer questions as they come up. The lectures aren't fun on ANY topic, least of all one involving perineal massage, emergency c-sections, and the Health Care System or Lack Thereof.
post #10 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaerynPearl View Post
I am not sick. Pregnancy is not an illness. I would rather go to someone who understands that and treats the birth as what it is, the beginning of a new life, rather than what you tend to get with most doctors, an emergency situation.
This really boils it down pretty well! If more questions arise from that, then I'm happy to elaborate. There are a fair number of people who get that "but it is an emergency" look right then, and at least you haven't wasted much of your breath at that point.
post #11 of 19
because others have mentioned this, I need to add... all the points I have made (that I listed in that one post) were all in response to specific questions she had... obvious concerns for mine and my daughters safety. I appreciated her concern and told her that info to let her know that I am not blindly putting us in harms way.
post #12 of 19
I take some info from "Born in the USA" by Marsden Wagner:

-OB's specialize in the pathology of pregnancy and birth (good one on its own!)
-OB's are highly skilled surgeons and most of them ARE OB's because they enjoy helping people by means of surgery.
-Midwives are the only care providers trained in NORMAL pregnancy and birth - not the pathology of it.
-All other industrialized countries that have better birth statistics than the US use midwives for the majority of pregnant women. OB's are used only when something is not normal.

Mostly I just keep my mouth shut. It seems so obvious to me and I have a hard time explaining it to others.
post #13 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by WifeofAnt View Post
Another huge plus I see is that the midwife is actually THERE for the labor. I would feel safer knowing that my caregiver was actually present and alert to how things were going. If then there WERE an emergency she would know about it and be able to act immediately. If something happens in a hospital how long does it REALLY take for a doctor to get there?
Very true! Easier to spot a problem when you are actually in the same room as the women. I was at a birth where the placenta abrupted and we had to wait for the doctor to come from home to diagnose it and do the c-section. Scary!
post #14 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDivineMrsM View Post
But I feel like DH alienates them by going off on the evils of our system.
Oh that is SO ME! I'm very passionate in general & opinionated on the whole. & modern American maternity care makes me FURIOUS!!!! I feel the need to WARN PEOPLE! Women & babies are abused by our system & I feel like not warning people is standing by & letting it happen - so I feel compelled to warn them.
Put all this together & I find it exceedingly difficult to not scare people by talking about the evils of our system.

But I realize it is not an effective way to spread the word among what I refer to as "mainstream" people. I realize that, so I do attempt to chill! It's really tough for me though.

I love this topic. So please forgive me, I've decided to play devil's advocate here. You all make good points, but I've seen many of these points simply bounce off mainstream people leaving them still thinking I'm a crazy hippy & utterly dismissing anything coming out of my mouth. So I'd love to hear your input on my devil's advocate responses. Thanks!

Quote:
Originally Posted by •Adorkable• View Post
Pregnancy is not inherently a medical issue so I don't feel it needs a Person chomping at the bit with a medical solution.
But the problem here is that I've found many mainstream women think,
"OK, sure, lots of times birth goes just fine, but babies & women can die! Birth used to be a common killer of women centuries ago! So I want an OB who is on top of things & will take care of me & my baby to make sure we're OK if need be. & I'd rather not have to transfer from the care of a MW to an OB if I do need a CS or something.
Why isn't it better to have the OB as your HCP in the first place? Just like it would be best to go the hospital with the highest-level NICU since it's better to have it & not need it than to need it & not have it."

& then where does the conversation go? Then how do you possibly begin to explain that when HCPs view birth as a 'problem' they actually CAUSE problems with unnecessary intervention? In order for someone to believe that, they must believe that typical American maternity care isn't always "good", therefore - they can't blindly trust their HCP. That's really tough for people to wrap their head around.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bella99 View Post
Anyways, I would be turned off by anyone, man or woman, who went off on the "evils" of the system.
But there is a lot of evil in the American system. There really is. There are so many facts I could point to of what can reasonably be considered "evils." Why should I deny that fact?

Although I totally get what you're saying. (Ha - & as I said, I realize I turn people off!) & I think there's a world of difference between saying something like, "GBMC is an awful place for a healthy woman to give birth," to a woman who's not even TTC, and me saying that to a woman who actually is planning to birth there!

In the former case, I'm giving my opinion - which I'm entitled to & is based on a lot of facts. It is a rational & reasonable statement. Whereas in the latter case, I'm judging someone's choice. I can see the need to respect others' decisions & not make such a statement to someone about her particularly choices.

But to non-PG ladies or newly-PG ladies picking a hospital? You bet I'm gonna warn them away from that butcher shop! Heck, I almost feel guilty or feel like I'm doing a disservice by not giving at least some slight words of warning.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gemasita View Post
-OB's specialize in the pathology of pregnancy and birth (good one on its own!
I've said this too but the fact of the matter is that OBs do attend like 90% of births in America! Everyone assumes that when you're PG, you have an OB - even other HCPs (I've had my ENT & my dentist ask me who my OB was. Not to mention other family members & friends who still don't remember I see MWs.) So it's difficult to try to convince a mainstream American woman that an OB is really NOT the appropriate care-provider for all healthy woman with healthy PGs because it's such a foreign, unusual concept.

and, again, see above - they tend to think you are 'safest' with the higher-level care provider. I actually had one mom tell me I was "brave" for choosing MWs - even though I had a hospital birth with CNMs! I can just imagine the look on her face now that I'm choosing HB for #2!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twinklefae View Post
I mostly point out why I like it -
<snip> Not because [hospitals] are horrible dens of evil, just because I don't like them. Never have.
Well, in the US, HB is less than one-half of one-percent of all births. It's very rare & viewed as VERY STRANGE - even free-standing-birth centers aren't common & at least one state has actually outlawed them!! ACOG & AMA have official policy statements against HB.

So if I were going to talk to a totally mainstream woman about other options (epis aside), I would not even mention HB because she'd totally shut-down & view me as completely insane. I'm not exaggerating on that either. HB really is viewed as a bizarre, on-the-fringe thing.

All that being said, if I DO try to focus on what is so great about midwifery care, or even what is great about natural birth (even in a hospital, or even with an OB), I've often found mainstream women still shut down. The idea that feeling your birth (i.e. no epidural) can be a pleasant, joyful experience is so bizarre in mainstream America that if someone's not already open to it, the conversation goes nowhere when you try to share how, "Yeah, it hurt, but it was still a really fantastic experience."

Or they dismiss me personally with comments like, "I'm not a super woman like you." (I'm a fitness nut & into weight-lifting, so that makes it easier for them to dismiss me as 'super woman.' Even though we all know darn right well it's not only super-fit, super-strong women who can have fantastic natural births. But, again, it makes it easier to dismiss me personally as an anomaly - a weirdo - an outlier.)

Maybe I can give some advice based on the conversations I've had that have gone south.

I think first & foremost the most crucial thing is:
Immediately clarify the fact that midwifery care & avoiding unnecessary intervention does NOT mean not getting an epidural!

Many women are just not in the least bit interested in considering foregoing the epi. They think, "Why go through all that pain if you don't have to?"

Since I was outspoken about planning an NCB, & subsequently had one, I think a lot of women immediately dismissed me & my input because they thought it was all centered around no-epidural. So I think in order to open a dialogue, it's important to clear that up.

So while I'd love to clarify the myths inherent in that statement (that birth is always horrifically painful, epis are risk-free, & there's no value in feeling any of the pain,) I think it's more worthwhile to launch into the chasm between evidence & practice in America today. So, I'd ideally love to help educate women that even if you remain dead-set on the epi, look into natural methods for coping with pain because they have a substantial failure rare (I've heard 15%, but not sure if that rate includes the times people have complete sensation on one side, 'windows' where they still feel pain in some areas, etc.) & you can't always get them immediately.

&, again, epi aside:
-avoid unnecessary induction
-avoid AROM (without good cause)
-avoid cEFM (which, obviously you can't do once you have the epi, but in the mean time)
-avoid CS for FTP
-avoid pit to 'speed things up' unless truly necessary
-avoid episiotomy in any case but fetal distress
-Room in & initiate BFing immediately
-etc.


But I think you can only get that message across until after you convince someone, "American maternity-care HCPs do not always have your best interest in mind (or, they think they do, but they're views aren't based in reality/science.) So you need to get educated, advocate for yourself, & not blindly obey your HCP.

Ya know, now that I'm typing it all up, I think even that message alone is scary. "Don't blindly trust & obey your HCP" is a scary thing. It means you need to take on a lot responsibility for yourself. It means you need to get educated. That is scary.

The other crazy irony in all of this is that sometimes what may be commonly regarded as the "best" hospital & OBs are the worst for healthy women. (That's the case here in Baltimore - Johns Hopkins, one of the best hospitals in the nation, is NOT good for healthy birth!)

I don't think there's any way to really get through to people on maternity care until they accept that fact as reality - that the best hospitals for sick people aren't necessarily the best for birthing women. Again, just like the higher-level care provider (OB vs. MW) & the hospital with the highest-level NICU aren't necessarily the best paths to the best outcome.

All this being said, sometimes people aren't interested in learning. So it obviously makes no sense to waste time & energy on it. Then you just annoy them if you keep discussing it - & confirm the existing suspicion that you're crazy! But I still can't help my feeling of wanting to warn people away from what I view as a way too high risk of evils. Sure, I also often share the flip side of how great midwifery care is & how fantastic my natural birth was, but again, I find the whole issue of "no epidural" makes people view me as a freak & shuts down the conversation.

The whole thing makes me keep frowning.
post #15 of 19
For me, it's BTDT. I did it the normal way - and I was traumatized. I know some people walk away from a c-section and not seeing their baby for 7 hours thinking that is just the way it is and never give 2 thoughts about it, but I was in pain and horrified at my treatment. And because of my first OB experience, now I have no choice what I want. If you start with a midwife and have a normal birth, and never have a c-section, why not start the best way and leave options open.

I am going with a midwife to get *some* options back, like being able to move during delivery and labor, not being refused food for over 48 hours, (come on - in what place is it healthy to give a person who hasn't eaten in 48 hours a cherry Popsicle and NOT expect them to throw it all up??), having a midwife there during most of the labor and not an OB being overwhelmed because she had scheduled inductions AND then had a few patients go into labor early that she couldn't wait to give me a c-section (it was 6 - dinner time - she had been there all day I was told - umm...so have I!)

I do believe there is a time and place for c-section and OBs - I do know many truly high risk mothers who delivered babies at 28-32 weeks because of severe high blood pressure or other health issues. But then my friends are older so maybe it's just a coincidence.

Anyways when people say stuff to me now - I simply say "I like to do a lot of research and working with a midwife appeals to me because I like the fact that ...." and I fill it in with whatever appeals to me at the moment.

I personally don't like the "evils" approach, mainly because I did not know at the time and I know better now, and I don't want anyone making me feel guilty ; ) But at this time, because of my distance to the closest hospital - 35 minutes depending on traffic, among some other issues, I am using a midwife in a hospital. If I lived 15 minutes away, I would do a home birth.

Funny thing is I was told once by someone that the ONLY reason a woman does a natural birth is so she can BRAG to other people about it! Well I had a epi that failed (or maybe they don't work on back labor?) so, I want a natural birth so I know how to cope with the pain if it happens again!
post #16 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by lillymonster View Post
I personally don't like the "evils" approach, mainly because I did not know at the time and I know better now, and I don't want anyone making me feel guilty ; )
But if you don't talk about the 'evils' how can you possibly let people know that it's best not to blindly trust their OB? If they're not even remotely interested in foregoing an epi, what appeal does midwifery care have for them - particularly if they think it's best to have the 'higher-level' care of an OB 'just in case' anyway?

I'm not trying to be difficult, I just really am curious what you all think. It's so hard because I want to warn people away from unnecesareans & abusive practices like denying food & drink. But the view "well, I'm not interested in natural birth anyway (no epidural)" tends to just totally shut the conversation down.
post #17 of 19
firstly a MW is TRADITIONAL haha hospital births are more modern/conventional these days...

all i simply said to everyone was why would i want to have my baby born in a place full of sick people?
then i got blah blah blah different units blah blah

seriously you can not "convince" people to do the right thing for their kids...the way i see it if they dont look into things themselves then they arent ready to be PARENTS KWIM?
post #18 of 19
If people ask why I went with a midwife, then I'll tell them why. If people don't ask, then I've found they probably don't want to know. I'll usually try to be inquisitive and supportive about the birth that they are planning. Sometimes asking about plans and reminding people that traditional obstetrics may not "allow" some of their wishes can open up a dialogue about midwifery that doesn't come across as preaching.

That said though, lord knows, I want to shout from the rooftops to stay out of the darn hospital if you're medically able!!
post #19 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by MegBoz View Post
But if you don't talk about the 'evils' how can you possibly let people know that it's best not to blindly trust their OB? If they're not even remotely interested in foregoing an epi, what appeal does midwifery care have for them - particularly if they think it's best to have the 'higher-level' care of an OB 'just in case' anyway?

I'm not trying to be difficult, I just really am curious what you all think. It's so hard because I want to warn people away from unnecesareans & abusive practices like denying food & drink. But the view "well, I'm not interested in natural birth anyway (no epidural)" tends to just totally shut the conversation down.
I have tried and tried and was told that going with a midwife - (and what irks me is when people who are much younger than me lecture me - I must be ageist discriminator!) is risking health. I mean, like telling me having a birth plan can kill you because people get stuck to it. Even after what I went through, I am wrong, my FEELINGS were wrong (I mean, my baby was healthy, I am healthy - why am I upset I had a c-section - she saved my baby's life afterall!)

I am trying to convince my mom that things have changed - that in her time when having a vertical incision c-section and a baby after 36 didn't mean a thing...and that you can't get the service she got from an OB back then now, and that ALL her births would have been c-sections if she had them now, she still thinks I am being dangerous. I am going to a midwife in a hospital, I mean come on - really? She had no clue being induced meant with drugs - she just thought it meant breaking waters, because that was all they did back then. Her response to me was "OBs have been working hard to get midwives out the hospital for a reason"

I am so totally into getting second opinions, third, fourth if need be. My DD has some health issues that are not easily pinned down. I have tried everything - from the top hospitals to chiro care. And the chiro care worked the best. But still people like to chalk that up to coincidence or her outgrowing her problems. Really??

As much as wish I could change peoples mind, as much as I "see the light" and know the mistakes I made, other people aren't going to want to believe their way is wrong in any way.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: I'm Pregnant
Mothering › Forums › Pregnancy and Birth › I'm Pregnant › Talking about midwifery with non-pregnant "traditional" friends