Quote:
| The only time it bothers me is when someone outside my family indicates that we're missing out because we don't have a son. Of course, we'd be delighted to have a son, and we know that there are things we're not going to experience as parents of all daughters, but really, our family is what it is, and we couldn't be more pleased. |
Plus, really, any family is going to be "missing out" on some experience. Have kids spaced close together? You won't get to savour the individuality of each child's babyhood as much as if you'd spaced them 6 years apart. Have kids spaced 6 years apart? You won't get to see them sharing interests and playing together in the same way, or watch a toddler hugging his baby brother. Have an only child? No sibling dynamic. Have ten children? Less individual one-on-one time with mum and dad. Have a boy and a girl? The boy won't get a brother, the girl won't get a sister. Adopt? The kids won't echo your features. Have gifted kids? They may never have a "normal" childhood or lots of playmates. Have kids young? You might miss out on a lot of young-adult activities your friends are doing, and not be able to afford to take the kids to Disneyland. Have kids when you're older? Less energy to run around after them. Marry an amazing guy with three kids? You might find yourself a stepmum, too busy to even think about TTC your "own" child.
Obviously these are all hideous generalisations, so please don't flame me for accusing you of neglecting your seven kids.

My point is, no family can have every good experience, because a lot of them are mutually incompatible. And often, life will take the planned shape of your family out of your hands altogether.
I don't think it's wrong to mourn that, though. Heck, my BIL and SIL, a mixed-race couple, have expressed sadness that they'll probably never have a child who looks like SIL. They have a gorgeous olive-skinned, dark-haired boy and are pregnant with #2... but even if they have ten, genetically, the chances are that there won't be a blonde, blue-eyed mini-SIL in the mix. And presumably she grew up with a reasonable expectation that her kids would look like her. So they're both a little sad about it - SIL makes jokes about how my DD, who is blonde and blue-eyed, could pass for hers, and apparently BIL recently made some comment about how if they "stole" DD, their family would look nice and symmetrical.

It's just... that's how life goes, you know? My sister, on the other hand, is engaged to an Indian guy, and declares she doesn't care at all that her kids will probably not favour her (at least in terms of colouring - obviously they may in other ways, but colour tends to be the thing people notice first in terms of "matching" parents to kids)... but on the other hand, she'd probably be VERY upset if she only had boys. Girls are her ideal family "vibe". You know?