Quote:
Originally Posted by Dov'sMom 
Don't know about 1000 years ago, but Jewish texts from 2000 years ago discuss pureeing food for babies, which would not have been necessary at two years.
Well not pureeing exactly -- Jewish law mandates that a person wait several hours after eating meat to eat dairy. The question addressed is the status of a woman who chews up meat to get pieces small and soft enough for her baby to eat but does not swallow any of the meat -- does she have to wait for dairy?
So according to the Talmud, babies were given solids before they could chew them themselves -- presumably in the first year of life. The Talmud also advises trying to wait two years after giving birth to get pregnant so as not to interfere with milk production for the baby, so obviously babies also got breastmilk for at least 2 years.
|
Wow! Very interesting!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrilein 
Jumping in late, but wanted to say that my dd didn't touch solids until she got her first tooth at 10 months. Coincidence???
|
I wonder if for your babe it was a sign of readiness. In DS's case, teeth don't seem to play a role. He has four teeth and still won't touch a morsel of food.
I've been thinking about this a lot these past few days... interestingly enough, he doesn't put tiny crumbs off the floor in his mouth the way DD did. I swear, she could find and eat the tiniest little crumb - even though I vacuum most every other day! DS only puts paper in his mouth (if he can get his hands on it and it's a large piece). Tiny stuff, not so much.