I'm sure this depends on the state... but...
if you aren't going to try and get child support from the birth father...
I believe as long as long as the father pays *something* it's like an 8 week cycle before he *has* to pay something again - that is, fathers can really take advantage of the system, in terms of child support...
So, I guess, as long as your ex-dh (who is a friend?) is willing to help you get out of a sticky situation, you could technically not have him sign anything that says it's not his baby... and just keep the status quo in terms of child support. That is, make an agreement with your ex-dh to keep paying for the same amount (for the child you have with him)... and wouldn't that block the actual birth father from being able to sue for paternity rights if your dh never signs something saying he's NOT the father? I guess if you want to totally block this dude, that might be one way to go about it... just essentially claim that your current husband IS the baby's father.
So basically, if they try and "go after him" for more money, he should be able to stick with what he's still paying because of the stupid loopholes (that are generally hard on single mothers whose ex partners pay the minimum, but may be used to your advantage in talking him into this, this time...)
Maybe I'm missing something here. Sorry if it's not clear what I mean...
if you aren't going to try and get child support from the birth father...
I believe as long as long as the father pays *something* it's like an 8 week cycle before he *has* to pay something again - that is, fathers can really take advantage of the system, in terms of child support...
So, I guess, as long as your ex-dh (who is a friend?) is willing to help you get out of a sticky situation, you could technically not have him sign anything that says it's not his baby... and just keep the status quo in terms of child support. That is, make an agreement with your ex-dh to keep paying for the same amount (for the child you have with him)... and wouldn't that block the actual birth father from being able to sue for paternity rights if your dh never signs something saying he's NOT the father? I guess if you want to totally block this dude, that might be one way to go about it... just essentially claim that your current husband IS the baby's father.
So basically, if they try and "go after him" for more money, he should be able to stick with what he's still paying because of the stupid loopholes (that are generally hard on single mothers whose ex partners pay the minimum, but may be used to your advantage in talking him into this, this time...)
Maybe I'm missing something here. Sorry if it's not clear what I mean...

















