Quote:
|
And what annettmarie said about starting backwards, like with sum of 5 and how to get there.....her worksheets practice that a TON, which readies them for subtraction without really knowing it.
|
At the end of that lesson, they're asked a few word problems. Johnny had some fish then he got 2 more fish and now he has 5, so how many did he have to start with? She had a LOT of trouble with that, probably in part because she's young and couldn't work around the problem to figure out what it was asking. She would just guess at answers -- BUT with my help she was able to work out on the abacus why her guess was wrong (eg, she guessed 4, so we said "he starts with 4 fish, put those on the abacus, then he got 2 more, add those... does he have 5 now? "No, 6!" Right, so he didn't start with 4."
The next couple lessons dealt with whole-part circles, moving tally sticks from the whole circle and dividing them into parts (sharing dog biscuits between different dogs teehee). She looooooved doing this and expanded the game herself to split different numbers other than just 5. After a couple days just practicing these concepts, she now knows COLD that 5 is made of 2 and 3 or 1 and 4, and can answer those kinds of questions she struggled with at first.
It wasn't until a few lessons after that, that it introduced the concept of addition -- "remember how we found that 2 and 3 make 5? Here's how to say it the math way -- 2 PLUS 3 EQUALS 5" and showed them the symbols.
Now she runs around saying "1 plus 1 plus 1 is 3!!! 3 plus 3 is 6!!!" So cute!
Anyway, my point is, I LOVE RIGHTSTART heh, because it's really teaching the concept of what addition/subtraction mean without focussing on algorithms and rote memorization first.

EDIT: Oh, and BTW, RightStart does not teach formal subtraction until level C. Parents just looking into the program and seeing the scope and sequence think "What?" and wonder if it's a real weakness. But in fact, they're doing subtraction from the very beginning because of how the whole-and-parts are always treated together, lots of 2+?=5 for example. When they do get to formal subtraction, they find it's easy because they've been doing it all along, just using new terminology... AND they don't fall into the trap of "counting down" to find the answer, but looking at the relationships instead. Dr. Cotter recalls one instance of giving the problem 100-99 to a student (who had had 'regular' math classes) and the poor kid got an ashen look on her face, and proceeded to count down... 100, 99, 98, 97... !!! That's why formal subtraction is "delayed" in RS, it's very much on purpose and not an oversight or weakness.









