Mothering › Forums › Pregnancy and Birth › I'm Pregnant › Child Spacing
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Child Spacing

post #1 of 37
Thread Starter 
Just wondering what everyone thought the 'ideal' spacing is and why. I know some people are going to answer 'its up to God' but what do you really prefer?

Personally, I'm not going to trust LAM or fate. In both mine and DH's family fertility returns immediately after birth no matter if or how you breastfeed and there is at least one set of 'Irish Twins/Triplets' (SIL had twins immediately after a singleton but I know I don't know about every loss ). DH wants 3+ years before we start trying again, I'm happy with at least 22 months between births. I picked 22+ months because it would be 12 months of nursing the first. If I lose my milk immediately then at least I'll make it out of the 'formula zone'.
post #2 of 37
Ours are almost exactly 3 years apart, which has worked out very well for us. I had originally wanted them to be 2 years apart, but it took us an extra year to conceive, and I'm so glad it did. By 3, dd was much more independent and able to understand that I needed to give a lot of attention to the baby, and I think that made the transition a lot easier for all of us.
post #3 of 37
Between #1 and #2, I have 13 years. Between #2 and #3, there are 22 months.

There are advantages to having that giant age gap between the first two. One of the biggest is that I have a "built in babysitter." Now that sounds worse than it is, like I take advantage of my teenager. I try very hard not to, but I admit it's easy to fall into that trap. What I really mean though is that when I needed to take a shower, or go pee or even just lay down for 20 minutes after being up all night, I could ask the teen to keep an eye on her. Also, as a teen, she's able to really understand when the younger ones need my attention and doesn't think I don't love her anymore. And, in the same vein, if she does start to feel left out, she's able to express that logically, rather than throwing a fit.

There are disadvantages also. The biggest is that you are genuinely starting over. Even though you have done the diapers and the sleepless nights and such all before, you do "forget" what it's REALLY like. Another one has to do with the sibling relationship...there's not much of one. I mean, my teen loves her sisters, but her relationship with them is similar to one of a very close auntie, rather than sisters who are friends and play together, if that makes sense.

With #2 and #3, my youngest is only 3 wks. So I am still figuring those pluses and minues out. One good thing is that we were JUST getting ready to get rid of the baby furniture when we found out we were pg. We didn't have to store it very long, we already had basically everything so we didn't have to buy anything new, and all of it was still good and safe, and new enough to be covered in any recalls.
post #4 of 37
My kids are 2.5 years apart and I'm pretty happy with the spacing. I definitely wouldn't want them closer together, and I don't think I'd want them more than 3 years apart.
post #5 of 37
Mine are just under 3 years apart, and I love it. DD is independent enough to help herself to food, handle toilet needs, get out of the car and into the house, put on her shoes, etc. Yet she's young enough that the two of them really "get" each other and entertain each other.
post #6 of 37
My first two are 15 months apart, and I love that they are so close. It was a little tough at first, but ever since the first year it's been great. They have the same friends, are basically at the same developmental stage, play constantly, and get along really well.

I'm pregnant with #3 now, and my youngest is 8, so there will be a huge gap... I plan on having #4 about 18 months after this one, I want to have a couple more months of breastfeeding (my milk dried up at about 6 months pregnant last time). But I definitely want the next two to have the same benefits as my first two had with each other.
post #7 of 37
It's so individual, it's really hard to make a definitive statement. If you want 3 kids and you're 39, you can't really "afford" a four-year spacing, you know? Or if you want your children really close in age, you might not get your fertility back for 2 years between each one and just have to wait it out. So I don't think there's a single "best", at all. I come from a family of six, spaced thusly: 1 1/2 years between #1 and #2, 1 1/2 year between #2 and #3 (me!), 3 year gap, then a 6 year gap, then another 3 year gap (and a miscarriage a few years after that). I'd say there were pros and cons to all those spacings.

Some facts I took into consideration before TTC:

- They say it takes two years after childbirth for a woman's body to regain its "normal" state - I think it's related to mineral stores, vitamins, hormones and so on. I'm not sure how breastfeeding factors into that.

- 70% of women lose their milk supply altogether during pregnancy. TTC at one year would indeed get you out of the formula zone, but it still might cut your nursing relationship short if you're planning to EBF. Of course, there's a chance you might not lose your milk, or your LO might happily nurse through anyway: but it's worth considering. Night nursing during pregnancy can be tough, tandeming can be tough, and so on.

- From many and various MDC threads on child spacing, I've noticed a LOT of women prefer a 3-4 year age spacing. The idea is that the first child is well out of the "baby" stage - often nursing minimally or not at all, playing with older-kid toys, able to help a pregnant mother rather than hinder her and so on. So the first child felt less supplanted by the second, and was also more able to understand and enjoy the pregnancy (and in some cases, the birth). Some also mentioned that when the baby was bigger, they weren't in direct competition for toys/activities/friends, and that minimised conflict. That said, plenty of people have said they enjoyed smaller and larger gaps as well. Lots of people said of small gaps that the first year or two was really tough, but the two kids entertained each other really well after that and were very close friends at the ages of, say, 8 and 9.

- I do Traditional Foods stuff, which places a great importance on preconception nutrition. So while DD was a "whatever" baby in terms of BC, this baby was preceded by some intense planning and eating. We still didn't do a preconception diet for nearly as long or well as the WAPF would recommend, but I feel I've gotten a head start - and if I can't eat anything but crackers for the next six weeks, at least my body has some decent vitamin and mineral stores to fall back on. This isn't exactly about timing, but it is relevant if you want to do any kind of cleanse/take any kind of supplement you can't take during pregnancy/get your fitness levels up/fix dental work and so on.

There are heaps more factors, obviously. One very practical one I thought of was babysitting - my parents would be much more likely to balk at babysitting two toddlers or a toddler and a baby than a baby/toddler and a somewhat older, more rational and helpful child. We don't actually ask them to babysit DD that often, but it's lovely when we do!

So, for me, I initially planned to give birth to #2 when DD was nearly 4, with a few regrets that they wouldn't be closer in age. Then we changed our minds, and got pregnant a few weeks ago - DD's 2.5 and will be three-and-a-third when the baby comes. Only time will tell if we've made the right decision! Now the deed is done I'm actually thinking we should have waited a few more months, but for various reasons it was a now-or-not-until-much-later deal. So. DD's getting older and wiser every day, and I'm very gently cutting back on nursing (particularly all-night nursing - we're limiting it to going to sleep and waking up now, and after a few nights of rage she seems perfectly OK with it!). Next we need to work on gently transitioning her to a toddler bed in our room, and fully potty-learning her before the baby comes. She's already seen a bunch of birth videos, though!

Good luck in deciding! The good news is, even if you get the spacing "wrong" you still get a baby. And that's nice.
post #8 of 37
I think somewhere between 2-4 years is good. Dd1 and dd2 are 4 years apart, it worked well. Dd2 and dd3 are 32 months apart, and dd3 and ds will be 31 months apart. I don't think I'd want less than 2 years between the youngest, preferrably with closer to 2.5 years.
post #9 of 37
I like the idea of 2-3 years between babies. Other than the little surprise I am carrying now, all our babies have been almost exactly 2 years and it is a space that I feel pretty comfortable with. I think in a way it depends on how many children you are planning to have. Now that I have three that are each 2 years apart I sometimes think three or four years would have been better. If they are too close together you stand to lose your mind for a little bit but If they are too far apart you can't count on getting a break while they play and have fun together. I think 2-3 year is a good space for most families.
post #10 of 37
my kids are 3, then 2, then 3 years apart (including the one im growing) i really liked the 3 year spacing with my 1st & 2nd because i really felt like i had time to get to know him and have that special bond.. when his sister arrived he was potty trained and sleeping in his own bed and a happy kiddo in general. he loved his sister and was helpful to me and very sweet to her. with my next baby there was only about a 2 year spacing and my youngest was still nursing a lot when i got pregnant and promptly weaned which made me pretty sad. she grew up fast after that and was also potty trained by the time he sister arrived and was also very in love with being a big sister, though the transition was a bit harder. all in all the age gap between my girls now (at 4 & 2) is nicer than the 7&4 in terms of what they have in common and how they play together.. so there is good and bad things i would say. im glad i dont have nay kids closer together than 2 years, though i know i would have managed if that had been how it worked out for us. this baby coming soon will be 3 years younger than my smallest, 5 years younger than my middle and 8 years younger than my eldest. it seems like a HUGE gap. we shall see how it all unfolds.
post #11 of 37
I am currently 34 wks pregnant with #4. My first three are quite close together (22 months between dd1 and ds, and 21.5 months between ds and dd2), and while it was very tiring the first while, they play very well together and are good friends. (of course, they also fight, but what siblings don't?) The spacing between dd2 and this current babe will be almost 3 years, which is easier in a lot of ways (she's toilet trained, is speaking well, understands what is going on). But if I had waited 3 years between each of my kids, I would have been older than I would have liked by the time #4 was born!
post #12 of 37
three years - they're potty trained and able to not be carried all the time plus adequate baby time and mama milk. they also end up close enough to play.
post #13 of 37
My first three all have about 3 years between each other... I like that spacing. A lot. Then I had a 6 year gap between my youngest boy and my daughter. It was rough on me because it was like starting over again and rough on my youngest boy because he was the baby for 6 years, it was a hard adjustment for him. There will be 3 years between my daughter and this one and I feel it's a good spacing.
post #14 of 37
My first two are 2 1/2 years apart and I love that age gap. We shot for that with our third and ended up having a hard time getting pregnant so the second and third are 3 1/2 years apart. This babe will be 3 1/2 years behind number 3.

I really love the 2 1/2 year age gap. They're still close enough that they play well together but you don't have two in diapers for long if at all and they're old enough to understand what's going on for the most part.

3 1/2 years is okay too but I feel like my youngest is tag along sister a lot of the time. She's just too young to play with a lot of the things my oldest play with.
post #15 of 37
I'll put in a vote for a bit closer spacing -- I was terrified when I discovered that DD2 and 3 would be ONLY 19 month apart. But instead, it has been great! Of course, some of that depends on personalities of the kiddos (I would probably be singing a different tune if DD3 was high needs!) I am amazed at how well my two youngest play together -- they are only 2.5yo and 1yo -- but they adore each other.

DD1 and DD2 are about 2.5 years apart, and while I thought that this spacing (or even more) would be better, there is a lot more conflict between them.

I did have to make changes to my plans for nursing because I got pregnant sooner than I had planned, which was hard, but does not seem to have harmed them physically or emotionally. I learned that I have to make decisions based on what's best for the whole family rather than just focusing on an individual child (which is just reality if you have more than one child...) but it did mean making some sacrifices that I wouldn't have otherwise chosen -- for example, I mother-led weaned DD1 when I was pg with DD3, I did not wear DD2 as much as I would have if I had not needed to wear DD3....
post #16 of 37
Thread Starter 
My first brother and I are 15 months apart (I'm older) and we never got along. I guess it doesn't help that he's autistic so we're currently at least 10 years apart mentally and emotionally. I guess I actually tried to kill him by standing on him when they first brought him home. My second brother is about 5 years younger. We get along great and always have. I still remember standing on a chair to call my dad's pager when my mother went into labor and pulling into the hospital parking lot after he was born to meet him. Maybe we didn't need a 5 year gap to be friends and maybe I could have gotten along with my first brother if he weren't autistic... who really knows though.
post #17 of 37
Funny, I was thinking "oh, about 22 months" in my head before I got to the end of your post. I prefer bfeeding for that first solid 12 mos before risking losing my milk with a pregnancy. I do lose my milk around the end of the 1st trimester. But, we haven't actually really used birth control in the past 5 years or so & my kids are sent right around 2 years apart anyway. So, I'm quite pleased that *my* ideal spacing lines up so very well with *His* ideal spacing.

So yeah, my vote is for 2 yrs apart. Close enough to play together well, & be homeschooled together well, & share a bedroom. Far enough that my baby gets to be the baby for awhile without my being a pregnant 1st trimester slug.
post #18 of 37
Really - about 15 months. Older kid is too young to understand what jealousy really is and thinks babies are great (in my experience).
post #19 of 37
my boys are exaclty 2 years apart.. well 2 year 24 hours and two minutes.

I love it my first was a really independant little guy so there was no issues there, and they are the best of friends right now. with number there there is another 2.5 year between 2 and 3 I actually wanted it closer but fertility returned when it did and I got pregnant when i did.. now looking back it's better this way as my youngest is a bit more higher needs than his brother and his brother is able to help out so much more.

It really come down to what you want. I love the close age gap
post #20 of 37
DD and #2 will be 28 mo apart. I like 2-3 year spacing because kids are close in age. I might have actually favor something closer except I was sooooooo not ready to be pregnant any sooner than I did when DD was 18 mo. Not only can they play together as kids, but they will be able to better relate to one another their whole lives. Me, sis, and bro are ~2 years apart each, and we went to schools together, have some friends in common, got married within a few years, and our kids will be around same ages, too (my sister's 1st will be same age as my 2nd). So overall family stays close throughout. I grew up very close to my relatives and cousins so that's just as important to me as the dynamics of just my kids.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: I'm Pregnant
Mothering › Forums › Pregnancy and Birth › I'm Pregnant › Child Spacing