Mothering › Forums › Parenting › Family Safety › fireproof pajamas?!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

fireproof pajamas?! - Page 2

post #21 of 36
We love Hanna Andersson PJ's for this reason. So soft. I've bought some great used pairs in their older looser style from Diaper Swappers (so excited to see their clothing section!). I have some of the current style for her as well and they even fit with her bulky night diaper.
post #22 of 36
Disclaimer: We are very careful, as much as we can, to limit our daughter's exposure to toxic substances. We eat organic food, use non-toxic cleaning products, etc. etc.

That said, I am a little concerned about the number of comments on this thread about how your children are unlikely to "catch fire", there are no open flames in your home, etc. When our daughter was 9 months old, she was sleeping in her crib (she used to spend the first part of the night in her crib, and then co-sleep with us) when the house next door burst into flames. By the time I woke up from the light of the fire through my window, the dormer ceiling immediately over her crib was burning. If I had woke up a minute or two later, I would have been extremely grateful for the extra time afforded by her flame-resistent crib mattress and bedding. (Our smoke detectors hadn't yet gone off because the fire was external to the house.) I am sharing this only to say that the risk of fire may be small, but not non-existent. I never thought it would happen to us.

The reason that children's bedding and sleepwear is treated with flame-resistent chemicals or sold to be tight-fitting is because sleeping children can be at risk from fire, and buying them extra time prevents more serious burns and even death. That said, my feeling is that we need to invent/develop safer fire-protecting sleepwear and bedding, because it's unacceptable that the trade-off is between safety and health.

And please, be sure your family has an escape plan from your sleeping area(s), and if your children are old enough, your children know what it is and can execute it if necessary. Take them to a fire station and introduce them to fire fighters so they aren't scared of them. Make sure your smoke detectors are functional.
post #23 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diane B View Post
Disclaimer: We are very careful, as much as we can, to limit our daughter's exposure to toxic substances. We eat organic food, use non-toxic cleaning products, etc. etc.

That said, I am a little concerned about the number of comments on this thread about how your children are unlikely to "catch fire", there are no open flames in your home, etc. When our daughter was 9 months old, she was sleeping in her crib (she used to spend the first part of the night in her crib, and then co-sleep with us) when the house next door burst into flames. By the time I woke up from the light of the fire through my window, the dormer ceiling immediately over her crib was burning. If I had woke up a minute or two later, I would have been extremely grateful for the extra time afforded by her flame-resistent crib mattress and bedding. (Our smoke detectors hadn't yet gone off because the fire was external to the house.) I am sharing this only to say that the risk of fire may be small, but not non-existent. I never thought it would happen to us.

The reason that children's bedding and sleepwear is treated with flame-resistent chemicals or sold to be tight-fitting is because sleeping children can be at risk from fire, and buying them extra time prevents more serious burns and even death. That said, my feeling is that we need to invent/develop safer fire-protecting sleepwear and bedding, because it's unacceptable that the trade-off is between safety and health.

And please, be sure your family has an escape plan from your sleeping area(s), and if your children are old enough, your children know what it is and can execute it if necessary. Take them to a fire station and introduce them to fire fighters so they aren't scared of them. Make sure your smoke detectors are functional.
Yes! Great point. Thank you for sharing this!
post #24 of 36
I think that fleece pajamas are "naturally" fire retardant because the fabric is made with fire retardants, therefore the finished clothing items don't need to be treated. I stay away from fleece, particularly for sleepwear.
post #25 of 36
I just bought PJ's today and bought the tight Carter's kind untreated, a few sizes too big. Otherwise, I have my 9 month old son sleep in a onesie or long sleeve onesie and leggings or stretch pants (found in the girls section usually). These tend to do the trick for warmth and avoiding chemicals.
post #26 of 36
It depends. Sometimes the cotton/snug are ALSO doused with chemicals...
post #27 of 36
I'm no sewing whiz but I got some SewSimple and SewEasy patterns (recently on sale at HObboy Lobby for 99¢) and I have been sewing some jammie pants for my son. They are so stinking cute with all the flannel prints out now, I think I may sew some up for Christmas gifts too. I did buy an adult pattern size too, so I can make them for the whole family. Really, they are easy. I usually pair them with a cotton tshirt or long john shirt or river driver style with the 3 buttons. Happy Sleeping!!
post #28 of 36
I buy the "footsie pajamas" from the Children's Place. When it gets really cold here I layer a long-sleeved onesie underneath. Both are made snug-fitting and are not treated with flame retardants.
post #29 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by jenniet View Post
I buy the "footsie pajamas" from the Children's Place. When it gets really cold here I layer a long-sleeved onesie underneath. Both are made snug-fitting and are not treated with flame retardants.
I second that. Came on here to say that actually. They have cotton one-piece footed for cheap and they are made well. I just handed dpwn some that look new that my ds wore and wore! They go up to 3t size online I think! They have fleece, too. But again... I don't know. I know that pj fleece just feels different from regular daywear fleece, so flame resisitance is not inherent to all fleece... something "special" about the pj fleece.
post #30 of 36
We have some of the tight fitting ones, but I hate them. They are so hard to get over my kids' hands, and on my non-skinny kids, they just look super uncomfy. I wouldn't want to wear tight clothes to bed. (We've had Old Navy and Hanna Andersson.)

We bought loose fitting cotton pjs in Germany, and when those are outgrown we'll just use cotton t-shirts and pants. I know there is a risk of burns, but it is low. Chances are the kids will never get injuries that could have been prevented by flame-proof pjs, but if we have the chemically treated ones, they will be exposed to the chemicals for hours and hours every night. I'm really not that freaked out about chemical exposure in general, but the whole "12 hours a day right next to their skin" thing seems excessive.
post #31 of 36
We just found this place at a local fair called grammys jammies and she sells a very warm heavy cotton not treated with chemicals that my children wear in the winter. She is the only one who sells them in the US, there are many ppl who sell them in Canada. I also love frugi jammies, made in England at frugi.com We also bought some organic cotton velour snug fitting custom made by a mom on diapperswappers, that we love! We did grow pants and grow sleeves so it would fit them longer but they are snug fitting. We buy cotton from gap or children's place that are snug fitting, cotton but not flame retardant. And, We also buy from hanna andersson as already mentioned. hth
post #32 of 36
Re: Carter's PJs: The guys who wrote Slow Death By Rubber Duck actually looked into Carter's. I can't remember the exact situation (and can't look it up because it was a library book), but essentially Carter's does treat them, just one step back in the process. So, if most jammies are treated after sewing, the Carter's are treated as bolts of fabric, or even as thread before the fabric is woven. The authors had to talk to a lot of people to get them to admit this.

Annie B. Bond's book Better Basics for the Home has a recipe for a non-toxic flame resistant treatment for clothes.
post #33 of 36
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lineymom View Post
I second that. Came on here to say that actually. They have cotton one-piece footed for cheap and they are made well. I just handed dpwn some that look new that my ds wore and wore! They go up to 3t size online I think! They have fleece, too. But again... I don't know. I know that pj fleece just feels different from regular daywear fleece, so flame resisitance is not inherent to all fleece... something "special" about the pj fleece.
looked into the childrens place WOW got some for $4.50! the fleece ones ARE treated so you have to get the cotton
post #34 of 36
I don't get it - how could children's place PJ's avoid having to meet the flame resistant requirement if they are considered sleepwear? How do we know that they are chemical free?

Wouldn't all organic kid's pj's be chemical free? I just assumed so..

My co-sleeping boys just sleep in organic cotton onesies and reg. cotton leggings ( for the 3 month old..) and always naked for the four year old.. The baby sleeps in a bamboo or organic cotton sleepsack... We use a latex mattress and a wool mattress cover. Bamboo is not treated with pesticide, but the manufacturing process is not so good, apparently.. sigh.
post #35 of 36
For the record, flame resistant fleece PJs will still melt easily, just not flame up. Better, since you kid will not necessarily burn all over, but still very painful. My DD hates PJs and sleeps naked or in her clothing, but the PJs I buy are all cotton and not flame resistant. Wool is naturally very flame resistant, but outside our budget.
post #36 of 36
I have gotten around the flame retardant issue by buying cotton Long Johns/Long Underwear ("not intended for use as sleepwear")
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Family Safety
Mothering › Forums › Parenting › Family Safety › fireproof pajamas?!