reading this forum i gather that gentle discipline has discovered that saying "no" is ineffective, and maybe worse ...? i am not aware of the theory behind this. any pointers?
dd is 9 mo old now and people have kind of put it out there that i should teach her "no" as it is a simple word she can understand that will keep her out of dangerous situations or even in cases where she may be pulling another baby's hair (obviously because she has no idea that it hurts). the first time she did this is was caught totally unprepared and silently pulled her back but i could tell that the other baby's mother expected more from me so i said to dd, "gentle touch!" with a voice full of concern and demonstrated what a gentle touch was.
i could go on doing this (with words that varied according to situation) but would a 9 mo old get the message if it is not consistent and simple? i am guessing as she gets more mobile there would be more ocassions where i have to keep her out of harming herself / others. how to do this without conveying negativity?
aravinda
dd is 9 mo old now and people have kind of put it out there that i should teach her "no" as it is a simple word she can understand that will keep her out of dangerous situations or even in cases where she may be pulling another baby's hair (obviously because she has no idea that it hurts). the first time she did this is was caught totally unprepared and silently pulled her back but i could tell that the other baby's mother expected more from me so i said to dd, "gentle touch!" with a voice full of concern and demonstrated what a gentle touch was.
i could go on doing this (with words that varied according to situation) but would a 9 mo old get the message if it is not consistent and simple? i am guessing as she gets more mobile there would be more ocassions where i have to keep her out of harming herself / others. how to do this without conveying negativity?
aravinda






