Vaccinated children 2.5 times more likely to have neuro damage

[karika]

The date on this is 2007.  How I didn't see it before is odd to me.  Why wasn't this reported on all media outlets?  This is BIG NEWS.  Using the same research method the CDC uses, a hugely disproportionate amount of neurological damage is seen in the vaccinated children.  Here is a link to the article I read.


http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/75333.php

[D_McG]

it was a self-reported telephone survey.  Not scientific resesarch per se. Consider the reporting bias when you're comparing parents who choose not to vaccinate (to give an example - perhaps considering their children 'spirited' instead of ADHD) etc.  It's just not valid research. 

[13Sandals]

the study wasn't scientific?  you mean like the vaccine trials that compare flu vaccine recipients to pneumococcal vaccine recipients?  like the op said, this survey method has been used by the CDC before and they seem to think their surveys are valid.  if anything, the 2007 survey called for follow-up, which the mainstream didn't want to touch.

[Otto]

Originally Posted by 13Sandals 

like the op said, this survey method has been used by the CDC before and they seem to think their surveys are valid.

Some of the problems with the Generation Rescue survey are detailed here.

[NaturalBirthGoddes]

Originally Posted by Otto 

Originally Posted by 13Sandals 

like the op said, this survey method has been used by the CDC before and they seem to think their surveys are valid.

Some of the problems with the Generation Rescue survey are detailed here.

So, Generation Rescue's phone survey is rubbish while the CDC's surveys are indisputable, trustworthy, and totally on the up-and-up?

I just think it's funny that the CDC and FDA will listen to bunk studies that "prove" things are good (only to turn around and pull them off the shelves for dangerous damages), but anyone else comes out with a study that shows something is dangerous (before the CDC/FDA pulls something off the shelves) and it's rubbish, false, undependable, etc.

I wonder how many times there have been studies that prove something the CDC/FDA approved was dangerous and never should have been approved...the authors of the study showing dangers got shot down, ostracized, etc...only to have the product in question pulled a couple years later...

[Otto]

Quote:

Originally Posted by NaturalBirthGoddes 

So, Generation Rescue's phone survey is rubbish while the CDC's surveys are indisputable, trustworthy, and totally on the up-and-up?

Can I vote yes on 1 and no on 2?