Respecfully, of course-- I don't agree with this. I don't think it was rude of the child to say that. I don't expect my children to be meek and polite to people who disrespect them. I expect and encourage them to speak up and defend themselves. I expect them to be assertive, but not to call names or get personal with people. So I would expect her not to say something like, "hey, stupid, I wasn't done with that." But what the child said strikes me as EXACTLY the right response.
OP-- I think the teacher was totally out of line. And I'm a teacher myself. If a child's dawdling and slowness are a problem in the class, then it needs to be resolved privately in a conference. NOT out in public where somebody can hear. And namecalling (turtle, rabbit) is a violation of a child's rights. It's not fair for adults to get to call names, if kids can't-- no matter how "gentle" those names are. Children rise to our expectations-- if we repeatedly tell a child she's a "turtle," she may take that on as an identity, and come to believe she really is inherently slow. Then she stops even trying to work faster. I think some nice goal-setting may be in order here-- what I'd do as a teacher is talk to the child privately, and tell the child that I believed slowness was a problem. Then I'd set some goals with the child's input-- if she can finish her task in X amount of time she can take some time at a favorite center, for example. This lets the child know that 1. she was control over her speed-- it's not something inborn that she can't help, 2. the teacher is basically sympathetic and wants to help, and 3. the teacher believes that she is capable of working more quickly.
It sounds like the teacher is in a big hurry-- some people do seem to be always in a big hurry, and impatient with the natural pace of life with children-- and is taking it out on the kids.











