I do believe the only real medical reasons for male circumcision are gangrene or frost bite. Just about any other penile problem can be corrected without removing the foreskin.
FGM is usually for religious reasons too but people view that as a horrific thing.
I do believe that if there is a religious reason or REAL medical reason for a circumcision that it is fine.
I agree about the medical thing, there is almost no time there is a real medical reason for a circumcision.
But, I am a Christian and believe every bit of the Bible so when God said to the Jewish people to circumcise their children to be a part of the covenant, I can't argue with that. But, I simply respectfully disagree with you and that's all I'm going to say about that. I won't mention it again. Just wanted to explain myself better.
I absolutely don't believe in FGM though.
This will probably get deleted, but I wanted to suggest gently that you also consider what the NEW TESTAMENT teaches about the NEW COVENANT. Paul's letters are very, very clear that circumcision is NOT part of the new covenant. Circ was an OLD TESTAMENT requirement only.
This will probably get deleted, too, but many many many of the OT "requirements" for the Jews are NOT followed anymore, either -- starting with animal sacrifices.