I have two kids who are at a similar academic level, or else the younger one is more advanced. She's certainly more confident. I suspect they're equally bright, but the older one has some anxiety, confidence and perfectionism issues, as well as dysgraphia, which put him at a performance disadvantage. They're currently 14 and 12 years old, but it's been like this all along.
Â
I've tried to avoid having them working in the same sort of program or following exactly the same sorts of interests. So if one was into reading novels, I encouraged the other one's interest in graphic novels. If one was doing a grade-levelled math workbook, with the other one I'd be exploring probability through hands-on work. If one was doing flash cards and drill, the other would be journaling or working on the computer. That helped them avoid seeing their learning as a sequential thing, with a sibling either ahead or behind them on the same path, but instead seeing it as a great web to explore, with each of them moving in different directions.
Â
I kept both them, as much as possible, out of comparative and competitive environments. That made it less natural for them to compare themselves to each other.
Â
Obviously it's a no-brainer than it's important to avoid comparisons between kids. I think that bears consideration when "pointing out that everyone has different strengths," which is standard advice on minimizing inter-sibling difficulties like this. I think there's something inisidious about saying "Everybody's good at different things. Ace is a great reader and you're awesome at soccer and drawing." That's consoling a child who is feeling like he's coming up short by drawing attention to how his brother comes up short too. The answer to an unfavourable comparison isn't to distract the child with a favourable one. It's to stop comparing. I'd be more inclined to say "Yes, reading has come very easily to Ace. His brain is different from yours, so it was easy for him to learn. Your brain finds some things easy to learn, but reading isn't one of the easy ones for you. I am so proud of the work you are doing on that. I know it's not easy, but you just keep at it, and I can see that it is paying off in good learning." Which gets into the next thing ...
Â
I have always put the emphasis on hard work and meaningful engagement with learning, and not at all on achievement. This flies very much in the face of our culturally-defined ways of relating to children: we're supposed to get excited over their first words, their honor roll grades, their perfect math quiz scores, the first book they read. But with practice a shift in parental mindset becomes easier. Should I be more proud of the kid who learns to read in 30 minutes or of the kid who spends 30 minutes every day for weeks gradually perfecting a proper pencil grip? Probably the latter, but everything we're programmed to feel as parents and members of our contemporary society is screaming at us to celebrate the reading. I mean, there is so much already rewarding the reading: the sense of ease, the world of books opening up, the fairly immediate gratification, the value placed upon literacy in school and in the media. The kid who really needs to be celebrated is the one who, after three weeks of work, has a pencil grip that stays well balanced all the way through a list of a dozen spelling words. By celebrated I don't mean cake and ice cream, I just mean expressions of parental appreciation and validation.
Â
Hope this helps!
Â
Miranda