I don't think there's been a test case or ruling on it, but it shouldn't be deductible under IRS guidelines for cosmetic surgery:
Quote:
Generally, you cannot include in medical expenses the amount you pay for unnecessary cosmetic surgery. This includes any procedure that is directed at improving the patient's appearance and does not meaningfully promote the proper function of the body or prevent or treat illness or disease. You generally cannot include in medical expenses the amount you pay for procedures such as face lifts, hair transplants, hair removal (electrolysis), and liposuction.
You can include in medical expenses the amount you pay for cosmetic surgery if it is necessary to improve a deformity arising from, or directly related to, a congenital abnormality, a personal injury resulting from an accident or trauma, or a disfiguring disease.
Example.
An individual undergoes surgery that removes a breast as part of treatment for cancer. She pays a surgeon to reconstruct the breast. The surgery to reconstruct the breast corrects a deformity directly related to the disease. The cost of the surgery is includible in her medical expenses.
I would love to request a private letter ruling (PLR) from the IRS on this. It could be worded to show that the procedure is NOT deductible, but there's still a risk that they wouldn't rule the way I think they should. Whichever way they ruled, the IRS would be bound to follow it in the future. I've considering requesting the PLR, but the minimum fee is $625 and that's a little steep.
Also, just being FSA reimbursable doesn't necessarily make it tax deductible. Until the end of this year OTC medications are FSA reimbursable but not tax deductible.
Follow Mothering