I would love some input from parents who have had their children in different schools, that is private vs public, and specifically 'holistic' schools (nature and play based) vs more mainstream schools. I need to make a decision about where to send my son and although he's only 3 now, because it involves where to live and how much to work, I am thinking a lot about it now. Basically I'm fortunate to have a lot of choice in the county where I live (I'm in England) where there are several alternative schools. Money is a huge issue - currently I'm a single mother on benefits (welfare) studying part time but I plan to start working again (self employed) in a few months time - still, I'm not sure its realistic to plan for private schooling, esp when DS's dad hasn't the means to contribute and furthermore is quite against paying for schooling on principle.
Â
One of the schools that interests me is a democratically run school (ie children included in the decisions, no hierarchy etc) which only starts formal schooling at 7 as per the European recommendations - which I wholeheartedly agree with, and in mainstream public schools and most private schools formal schooling here starts at FOUR - and the other also starts formal schooling at 7 but also is very nature-based, play-based, and taking the learning objectives from the children - ie it doesnt follow Government Curriculum (the curriculum here is v problematic and comes with a lot of chart ticking and pressure on children and parents). The fees are also lower than other private schools.
Â
BUT there are 'good' public schools in our area too, and I sometimes wonder if I'm just making a rod for my own back about something that won't matter that much to my child. I think it matters more to ME, you know? I SO want him to keep his natural love of learning, his confidence and independent thinking, and I think that public schools here cannot support that fully by their very nature (high teacher/student ratio, the government targets, etc). It's also important to me for him to spend a lot of time in nature, and this second school offers that with a woodland on premises and a forest school as part of the schooling.
Â
The thing is it will require me to work full time and therefore spend a lot less time with my son in order to pay for these schools....and I'm just not sure what is going to be more important for him and for our (albeit small) family: me to be there for him after school or for him to go to a school that he can come out the other end being as whole as possible. I have to add that my own extremely negative public schooling experience definitely colours my perceptions and ideals here - bullying (from teachers and pupils), total boredom and just generally not at all being supported to reach my potential. I want my son to have the opposite of that, i guess, but it involves a huge sacrifice.Â
Â
Anyone have any input? Sorry for the long post!








