Hey, I'm reading through this book right now (not sure what chapter I'm on since it's on my kindle...) but I'm about 20% of the way through it and I keep having questions crop up so I was hoping to start a discussion about it. Many of my questions are just about things mentioned in the book but I'm sure someone who understands Montessori well could answer them without having to have read the book first. So I hope you don't mind if I pick your brains a bit and I'll probably be posting more as I go through the book (but I figured I would make one thread instead 15 million
).
Â
1. I really loved how they described using gestures and how that connects with language development in infants. There's a study in there that mentions that showing parents how to gesture and relate it to labeling objects can improve language skills in the short term i.e. in the under 3 crowd, but then the results are washed out by about 3. I was wondering if anybody knew anything about that study because my first inclination was to wonder if the parents had updated versions of training in gesturing (or let's just say ASL because that would make more sense) as the child's language develop. We did ASL with DD and it worked wonders for early communication but eventually she out grew my own knowledge of it and we stopped. I wonder if we would've been fluent in it if it could've continued to aid her language development and if it could even be a useful tool in the class room for children to communicate without breaking another child's concentration?Â
Â
2. Another chapter discussed freedom of choice. I think that's my favorite so far but I wonder how this could be applicable as a child grows and eventually specializes in certain subject areas. Is it possible to teach an advanced math curriculum using freedom of choice and physical manipulatives? I was thinking that even something like integration in calculus could be done with blocks that fit underneath a curve (you could even show that the more blocks that you use the more accurate result you get when it comes to numerical integration).Â
Â
3. I think I still don't quite understand limited choice and I'm really hoping someone can clarify this to me (maybe it addresses this more later on). But when it talks about young children (maybe ages 2-3) it suggests that the teachers would only introduce a limited number of works to them. I understand this from a practical standpoint because kids that age just don't have a huge amount of self-control but doesn't it also mean that you're really limiting them because some kids that that age don't learn in a very linear pattern (DD does this a lot) or they could be ahead/behind those works but it might not be appearant if they are only shown specific works? I'm just trying to understand this and maybe it would be made clearer to me if I was actually there in person seeing it...
Â
4. They talked some about "going out" trips once or twice a month. Is that something for kids of all ages and if so how do that organize that at your school? I'm assuming the parents are told about them ahead of time?
Â
I'm sure I'll have more questions later but I hope you don't mind me picking your brains for a bit since I'm really trying to understand everything here. :)










Our former church did something that is called Godly Play (the creator of it based it on Montessori) and it was so cool to see where that idea came from. Anyways, reading that made me wish so much that I had a chance to have a Montessori education as a kid. I love how they just give enough info to get you excited and asking questions but not so much to be overwhelming or confusing. After reading this section I made DH read it right away and we kept wondering how something similar could be implemented at the university level. I think that chapter really hit the nail on the head about how subjects SHOULDN'T be separated. It doesn't make any sense to separate stuff like algebra and trig when so much of it overlaps, for instance. I think we're actually do a disservice to our kids when we do that because then it's much harder to make connections between the two. It really gave me a lot to think about.