Â


Aside from your distaste for being yelled at, makes sense, it sounds to me like your concerns are with regards to extended breastfeeding and the part about malnutrition. Firstly, many children are breastfed well beyond the age of your child, mine is one of them. Breastfeeding is known to complement nutrition for a child your sons age. So I see no need to wean your child. Weaning as far as I'm concerned is between you and your child and you can continue to see your Dr. and get decent care even if there is a disagreement about what age one should wean their child. I think it is possible that your Dr.'s intent may have been that sufficient nutrition is not being met with a diet of mostly breastmilk. Therefore suggesting that nutritional needs may be more adequately met with a more substantial non-milk diet. So perhaps decreasing breastfeeding is not a bad idea, so that the child may be more interested in other food sources, thus gaining more sustenance from a variety of sources.
Â
My concern for you is that your child's weight may actually be an indication of malnutrition. I know that may be a tough pill to swallow, and may not even be accurate...but I think by the sounds of your alarm, some part of you may be wondering if it actually may be factual. Have you looked at the WHO charts? Your child is very much way off the charts. If I were in your shoes, and I am not and don't actually know the whole picture...but since no one here has dared mention it...I would definitely reconsider my child's diet. If your child can't have dairy, I would look into other healthy sources of fats and calcium. Adding butter, or hemp seed oil to foods, or even by spoonful (I do this for my child and she loves it). There are alternatives for good sources of calcium too. I would also be concerned about iron, since it can impede growth and there is not enough available through breastmilk, particularly after 6 months of age.
Â
As far as the comment about McDonalds, I think it might be fair to give the benefit of the doubt in this case. Maybe what her intent in saying that was more about acknowledging that kids can and should have fats in their diet and that sometimes it's ok to not give the healthiest of health foods. B for Balance. HCP are just people too and sometimes in a busy stressful day we say things that are not exactly what we mean, or we say things that come out the wrong way because we are tying to make a point which completely backfires on us. I think your Dr. might have your kids best interest at heart, but it's hard to see that when you feel under attack.
Â
I'm just offering a different, perhaps harder to accept, point of view.
Â
BTW, I'm tandem nursing a 2.5 yr old and a 5 month old. We're vegetarians, also lactose intolerant and would never *ever* eat at McD or anywhere like it...we cook from scratch and eat organic.(just to give you an idea of where my thoughts are coming from) My dd1 was about 85% breastfed at about 15 months old and she's always been in the 99% for weight, and height. My DP is 6F and weighs 145 soaking wet, I'm 5'5 and 135 postpartum...so I don't think we can always count on genetics to tell us what size our babes will be.
Â
Wishing you and your kiddo all the best.
that link is to the CDC growth charts, not the WHO growth charts, and he's doing a lot better according to the WHO growth charts.Â
Actually, it IS the WHO chart. Look at the bottom of the chart on the left where it says Source. It's also indicated in the webaddress too that it's a WHO chart. The WHO growth charts can also be accessed from this website, which comments about the importance of using growth charts representative of the difference between breastfed babies and formula fed babies. If you were to actually print the chart and plot a 20 pound 20 month old, you would see that the point would be made completely off the chart.
Â
Â









