Quote:
Originally Posted by
bcblondieÂ

Strange update. Today DS touched all the balls, And I didn't make a big deal of it. He lost interest in the tree pretty quick, and barely pulled anything off today. :)
This actually make a lot of sense to me. Last year, it was all touchable stuff on the lower branches, like people have said. But also, sometimes praise doesn't go as far as you think for certain behavior issues, IMO. Just not making a big deal has worked for us pretty well. We aren't touching the tree all the time, so why should he? It becomes a modeling issue, seems to me.
Â
Also, FYI, we love the bell ornaments, instead of the glass balls. This year DS could put them on himself, and we purposefully left the lower branches open for him.
Â
And, funny story, there were two Nutcracker ornaments that are made of wood and safe for DS. Well, he decorated the tree and he put the two "mans" together, so they would be together on the tree, right? Like friends? Makes sense to me. But, of course there's this unwritten tree-ornament-rule that says no like ornaments together. So DH comes home that night after work and sets about fixing DS's job - I stopped him from moving anything but the "mans" whom he separated. And what do you think happened?
Â
DS noticed right away the next day and was all, "why are the mans not together?" and moved them back together. DH didn't believe he would care, but I had told him! 
Â