I don't know why DH favors the choice to circumcise when DS is born, and I am still on the fence. I don't care, either way, there will be different care for both either way.
I've brought it up a few times during the pregnancy, and I wonder if there is a different way to bring it up to figure out a more definitive reason for both of us on whether to leave DS intact like his father. I don't see the harm in it. And while Tri-Care (military insurance) will cover the cost of it - why take the extra expense on the government for something that is purely cosmetic? (And don't get me wrong, I understand there are circles that do it for religious purposes, but I still see it as cosmetic.)