Every nephew I have is circumcised. Many of my friends have circumcised their sons. Other than providing information and links and telling them what I would do if I were to have a son (NOTHING) - right now, it's a decision that parents are allowed to make, legally. It's really lousy and wrong, and I'm with you -- as I learned more about the damages of circumcision, it has become more and more difficult to hear from family and friends that they're circumcising.
States that have defunded Medicaid payments for circumcision (I believe California was the first) have much lower circumcision rates. A few years ago, there were posts on this board asking for volunteers from states which still funded circumcisions via Medicaid, to contact legislators and Health Departments in those states. They had packets of information, form letters to modify and personalize, etc. I sent my packets off to my local representative, senator, and the State Dept. of Health at the beginning of our most recent legislative session. My state is one of the few in the country which is operating in the black, so I think there was less worry about balancing the budget here (nothing came of it this session, we'll see whether they introduce something next year); but in states which are cutting funding, this can be a potentially painless cut for them to make, and it's pretty easy to make a persuasive argument that it shouldn't be funded (not recommended by medical groups, considered a "cosmetic" surgery which isn't supposed to be covered anyway, declining rates nationwide, etc.).
It's a small thing - but, at the same time, it can really make a difference. I don't know whether your state funds circumcisions, but if they don't, that might be an angle to take to begin reducing rates. I think it was NoCirc which was coordinating the legislative approach - I believe South Carolina quit funding them this February, as a result....
