I hope this is trimmed enough, there is a similar data set published from Taiwan, title below. The cdc info is saying 77% coverage and saying that is why gbs still exists and the very early studies when they were treating risk factors only, and remember preterm was a major risk factor set, that pretem and very early preterm had increased ecoli and antibiotic resistant ecoli
J Perinatol. 2011 Apr 28.
Early-onset neonatal sepsis: rate and organism pattern between 2003 and 2008.
Sgro M, Shah PS, Campbell D, Tenuta A, Shivananda S, Lee SK.
Source
1] Keenan Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada [2] Department of Pediatrics, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada [3] Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Comparisons of incidence rate, demographics and causative organisms were carried out between earlier cohort (2003 to 2005) and later cohort (2006 to 2008).Result:A total of 405 infants had positive blood and/or cerebral spinal fluid cultures over the study period. The EONS rate was 6.8/1000 admissions (n=24969) in the earlier cohort compared with 6.2/1000 admissions (n=37484) in the later cohort (P=0.36). Rate of clinical chorioamnionitis was higher in the later cohort (38 vs 26%; P=0.02). For term infants, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CONS) (2.4/1000) followed by group B Streptococcus (GBS) (1.9/1000) were the most common organisms identified. For preterm infants, CONS (2.5/1000) followed by Escherichia coli (2.6/1000) were the most common organisms identified. There was a significant reduction in GBS EONS over time (P<0.01) and a trend toward an increase in other organisms.Conclusion:Although the rate of EONS among neonates admitted to NICUs has not changed, the pattern of infection has changed over the past 6 years. With the increased use of prophylactic antibiotics to mothers, careful surveillance of the changing trend of bacterial organisms among neonates is warranted.Journal of Perinatology advance online publication, 28 April 2011; doi:10.1038/jp.2011.40.
PMID: 21527901 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Pediatr Neonatol. 2011 Apr;52(2):78-84. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
The changing face of early-onset neonatal sepsis after the implementation of a maternal group B Streptococcus screening and intrapartum prophylaxis policy--a study in one medical center.
Lin CY, Hsu CH, Huang FY, Chang JH, Hung HY, Kao HA, Peng CC, Jim WT, Chi H, Chiu NC, Chang TY, Chen CY, Chen CP.
Source
Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
And in the Netherlands they have reported decrease in GBS but increase in late onset infections...
Neonatology. 2010;97(1):22-8. Epub 2009 Jul 2.
Long-term trends in the epidemiology of neonatal sepsis and antibiotic susceptibility of causative agents.
van den Hoogen A, Gerards LJ, Verboon-Maciolek MA, Fleer A, Krediet TG.
Source
Department of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
In an era with increased maternal antibiotic use, patterns in early- and late-onset sepsis and antibiotic susceptibility may have changed.
OBJECTIVES:
To identify longitudinal trends in causative microorganisms for neonatal sepsis and analyze antibiotic susceptibility of all blood isolates of infants with sepsis.
METHODS:
Early- and late-onset sepsis cases from 29 years (1978-2006) were studied retrospectively, in five clusters of 5 years (period I-V) and one cluster of 4 years (period VI), including antibiotic susceptibility profiles of blood isolates during the years 1999-2006.
CONCLUSIONS:
The incidence of early-onset sepsis mainly caused by GBS decreased. In contrast, the incidence of late-onset sepsis, predominantly caused by CONS, increased significantly. The incidence of fungal and yeast infections remained low. The majority of CONS blood isolates were susceptible for first-generation cephalosporins.
Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Comment in
Neonatology. 2010;97(1):29-30.
PMID: 19571584 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
And there is this free full text article in Pediatrics look specifically at table #1 you will see numbers of infections and organisms... Note that although GBS declines in number others greatly increase
Like gram positive ecoli starting at 3 and increasing to13, gram negative ecoli starting at 15 and increasing to 71.
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/125/5/e1031.long