Mothering › Forums › Health › Vaccinations › Are there any studies of non-vaxed pops vs vaxed pops? I'm sick of the thimerosol debate, I don't believe its the real issue.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Are there any studies of non-vaxed pops vs vaxed pops? I'm sick of the thimerosol debate, I...

post #1 of 4
Thread Starter 

I have believed for a long time that Thimerosol and mercury were not the real problem with vaccines.  From the things I have read and my education in physiology and pathology, its the altering of the immune system through artificial means of vaccinating that causes the damage. 

 

Anyone know of any?  Thanks

post #2 of 4
I'm sick of the thimerosol debate, too! Why aren't they looking at the acculumation of artificial/toxic ingredients of all vaccines combined, not just the mercury? They need to focus on more than just thimerosol, as I too don't believe that that is the only issue.
post #3 of 4

There are no controlled studies of vaxed vs unvaxed. There have been informal studies (like the one done by generation rescue)

post #4 of 4

there are some that are specific for vaccines though. from this blog http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=5025

 

there are links to two studies which compared placebos with vaccines and a response that indicates that the terms " 'Vaccine’, ‘efficacy’,  ’randomized’ and  ’placebo control trial’  results in 416 Pubmed references."

 

i'm not sure if this is what you're looking for?

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Vaccinations
  • Are there any studies of non-vaxed pops vs vaxed pops? I'm sick of the thimerosol debate, I don't believe its the real issue.
Mothering › Forums › Health › Vaccinations › Are there any studies of non-vaxed pops vs vaxed pops? I'm sick of the thimerosol debate, I don't believe its the real issue.