Calm, I would like you to present one, just one feasible way that MMS can cure conditions as disparate as cancer, AIDS, malaria, fibroids and ovarian cysts, and autism.
In a word: microbes. It oxidises microbes internally, just as it does externally. It isn't that wild a claim. Proof it enters all body tissues has been established so we can't say it is a huge leap to the conclusion that it also kills microbes in those areas of the body that it reaches. That matches the overwhelming anecdotal evidence.
But because that needs more than that, I'll give some background, although I don't hold any hope in altering your thinking which is possibly based in years/decades of a particular approach. I will assume the first thing that came to your mind is that not all those things listed are microbial. Koch's postulates are responsible for why you think that, but more on that later...
Research DMSO. That will help open the door to a whole new world of viewing disease. DMSO helps so many things, and is proven to do so... yet they are all so different.
Another thing to think about is... what if it was 1995, and I told you an antibiotic/oxidiser/any other anti-bug could cure a stomach ulcer. You'd reasonably ask how on earth is that possible... but only because in 1995 you didn't have all the information necessary to understand why it is possible. That information is: bacteria causes stomach ulcers. What seemed a ridiculous link becomes common sense now.
Those who use anti-microbial treatments have found their atherosclerosis and Crohn's disease was going away. How on EARTH could that be possible, the doctors all demanded to know, then promptly rejected the anecdotal evidence in puffed up disgust. Only to learn years later that research has discovered both those things are caused by microorganisms. Oops, that was a bit of a silly knee jerk reaction to dismiss anecdotal evidence of such an extensive nature simply because they didn't know what caused those diseases. I would think that not knowing what causes them was a prerequisite for being ready and open to the possibilities of what MIGHT cause them. Yet, oddly, this is so often not the case. It's so doggedly like, “We don't know what causes ABC but it isn't THAT.”
Crohn's disease research: http://www.crohns.org/research/index.htm
Nobel Prize dot org Press Release 2005: http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/2005/press.html
"Many diseases in humans such as Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, rheumatoid arthritis and atherosclerosis are due to chronic inflammation. The discovery that one of the most common diseases of mankind, peptic ulcer disease, has a microbial cause, has stimulated the search for microbes as possible causes of other chronic inflammatory conditions....The discovery of Helicobacter pylori has led to an increased understanding of the connection between chronic infection, inflammation and cancer."
One of the fundamental differences between orthodox medicine and naturopathy is orthodox medicine follows Koch's postulate.
Koch's postulates are:
The microorganism must be found in abundance in all organisms suffering from the disease, but should not be found in healthy organisms.
The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in pure culture.
The cultured microorganism should cause disease when introduced into a healthy organism.
The microorganism must be reisolated from the inoculated, diseased experimental host and identified as being identical to the original specific causative agent.
Note point 3. The cultured microorganism should cause disease when introduced into a healthy organism. All experiments done in the early 1900's to prove microbes cause particular diseases could not make that postulate stick. Koch's postulates have caused untold damage to humanity and held back medical progress in massive ways. There are so many diseases that could be easily treated if medicine would just recognise they are microbial, but this postulate is a necessary test to pass, so how on earth are those diseases ever to be recognised as microbial? And then there is point 1, not found in healthy organisms... again, this renders things like candida as a cause impossible, because candida is found in healthy subjects.
One stumbling block is that some of the microbes responsible for these diseases are present in most or all human systems... such as candida and H. pylori and mycobacterium. You cannot test for candida for instance, because it is present in all human beings. A test can only show there is perhaps an overgrowth. If you have vaginal thrush and get a blood or stool test for candida, it will show negative... but the woman sure as hell knows she has candida, and an antifungal or douche of yoghurt cures the infection. So "tests" for microbes are all but useless if those microbes are naturally part of our flora. If that woman has thrush, she almost certainly has it in her gut also but she gets no treatment for that because the doctor will find no evidence of overgrowth. Antibiotics cause thrush so often that a vaginal cream is often given at the same time these days "for the vaginal thrush". What about the colon thrush?
From the Crohn's link above:
In the early 1900's, the disease we call today "Crohn's disease" was characterized as an infectious disease, specifically intestinal tuberculosis. However, by the early 1930's, definitive classification (proof) that this disease was infectious was not forthcoming. More specifically, when Dr. Burrill B. Crohn failed to prove an infectious cause in 1932, the disease became formally known as "Crohn's disease" (named after Dr. Crohn) and the search for an infectious cause was largely discontinued.
H. Pylori, the bacterium responsible for the stomach ulcers, is considered normal stomach flora because up to 80% of people have it, and only 20% of people actually get disease from it. The question researchers are finally asking is why do some people get attacked by these microbes? Previously, they didn't even acknowledge they existed, and naturopaths world over were “quacks” for treating them as microbial... regardless of the anecdotal evidence people were getting cured.
Things are moving back to where we were before Koch's postulates halted medical progress. Back then, we discovered a bunch of diseases were caused by infection that passed the postulates and so much medical progress was made. Infection was the biggest scourge of mankind 100 years ago and lo and behold, it turns out they are STILL the biggest scourge of mankind, we just couldn't prove it due to postulates. You cannot prove stomach ulcers with Koch's postulates very easily, because the stomach acid will kill of most via the oral route, and the immune system of a healthy subject will fight off an injected route. Koch's is great for things like measles and influenza, but not all microbes behave that way.
Koch split all disease into two groups: infectious microbial or non-microbial. Naturopaths simply acknowledge a third type: non-infectious microbial, or put another way: non-contagious microbial.
The whole concept that the “body just turns on itself” is guess work by ortho med, and is as ridiculous as it sounds. They don't know what causes so many issues because of the limiting tests they've put to researchers to pass like Koch's, so they just put it all down to genetics or “well, it just happens sometimes”. “oh, you have inflammation? You need an anti-inflammatory”. That is just unacceptable in naturopathy. Naming the symptoms, ie, you have inflammation (flame/heat), you have diabetes (sweet urine) is stating the obvious and tells us nothing of the cause. We go to a doctor and tell them what we have and in exchange they... tell us what we have only using different language. This is called a “diagnosis”. I find the whole thing strange. Naming and treating the symptoms is not good enough.
Somehow, the font just changed.
I love that so many diseases are coming out as microbial, because that lends weight to the way those diseases have been treated alternatively for millennia. Considering Europe is just about to pass a law that makes it illegal to buy supplements or herbs unless prescribed by a doctor and the supp has passed rigorous and prohibitively expensive testing... that kind of validation is needed ASAP before our health freedoms are stomped further.
I know, you don't believe those diseases are microbial, and all I can say is... watch it unfold. Stomach ulcers, Crohn's, inflammatory conditions... so many have already proven microbial or so close to proven it can't be dismissed any longer. It really is a matter of time before all the dots are joined on so many other conditions and in the meantime, alternative practitioners are having what is considered "miraculous" success with things when it really is very simple: kill the bugs! The biggest single contribution to medicine we could possibly find right now is a substance that safely and effectively kills pathogens on all spectrums, be it viral, bacterial, parasitic... whatever. Esp the mycobacteria because they are seriously ugly guys and at the root of so much. Is MMS that substance? I don't know. The evidence as I see it seems to suggest it has the best potential. But if it isn't, something with that kind of broad spectrum power has got to come out soon.