Quote:
Originally Posted by
Linda on the moveÂ

They are unrelated issues. She isn't any more or less eligable for speech based on her reading scores.
Â
Â
Sadly, the state you live in makes a difference when advocating for services that are not directly related to school to performance. It shouldn't, and it all covered under federal law, but it is interpreted differently in different places.
Ditto this.
Â
Really-- any child that meets the 'qualifications' for speech should get services. The state we moved from offered speech IEPs w/o academic testing. Kids were screened by the SLP in Sept and students that had SEVERE artic or language concerns got picked up on her caseload (SLP). If there were no academic concerns-- there was no academic testing (particularly in K it is hard to show academic delay due to the normal range of acceptable skills).
Â
BUT that said-- other schools in our area were not so proactive and/or as flexibile.
Â
That also said--- it depends on age for artic. Most artic kids did not get picked up in K/1st since some error self-correct. The 'r' is one of the latest sounds to develop and can come as late as age 8. Our SLP (who was fantastic) would not have picked up a kiddo for isolated sound errors unless it rendered the speech unintelligible and/or it was causing sound/letter confusion.
Â
I dont know which Dd you are referring to (the older or younger).  If your DD is the older one  and closing on age 8- I would be concerned. If it is your younger DD, most SLP would give minor artic errors some more time to self-correct.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
A-time-to-liveÂ

 You should be able to argue that your DD should qualify for services if she is so anxious that she is afraid to speak in front of the class or if her teachers/peers have difficulty understanding her.
You could go this route too....totally depending on how severe her artic errors are and her age. Most schools have a scale and a cut off for artic to qualify. BUT if there is intense anxiety or mutism involved, they often will intervene sooner.
Â
Often if a kiddo with artic errors is falling behind in reading-- they will place the kiddo in for reading AND artic errors together. Since the sound errors are preventing learning sound/letter relationships (a j sounds like a dr or a a v sounds like th, etc) and can seriously hamper writing, spelling, and ability to read/decode words.
Â
Kids that are not behind in reading and are 90%+ intelligible and under age 8 are often given some more 'time' since many will self-correct.
It looks as if your Dd falls in this category. It has nothing to do w/ giftedness (an average non-GT student would also be this way and possibly not qualify for speech as well) but rather the qualifying standards most districts use.
Â
Â
Artic is often a musculature/ oral motor concern and has little to do with IQ and/or 'reading' ability. It is more of a the ability to move the tongue/lips/mouth in the correct formation to make certain sounds. I would doubt that it would make a difference between your DD being AT grade level or way ABOVE grade level, if the artic is not impacting her success at school and she is under the acceptable age range for the errors, there is little to go on besides anxiety that it may cause her, which is something you should keep in mind-- but does make it a bit more complicated to get services since it can be more subjective than a flat score for qualification.
Â
Â
Â
Good Luck- fight for speech only services, even if it is on consult and/or home exercises. You could also see what your insurance would cover for private speech class. OR wait until she gets past the 'age' limit for those particular speech errors and request a reeval for services ( it is awful to wait, but sometimes it does make a difference since scores are normed by age and there can be a big difference even between 3 months a 7y10m old and a 8y 1m old  per percentile ranking and scores)
Â
As, PP stated---- it can vary by school, district, and state, depending on how they interpret the law and qualifications. Some areas are more proactive than others unfortunately.
Â
Â
Â
FWIW- DH is very smart/intelligent and has had a moderate stutter his whole life- he still sounds, talks, writes, thinks very intelligently and no one would ever think otherwise. His stutter is just part of his speech patterns at this point and to be honest I rarely notice it anymore. He also has been a successful salesman and is very much an extrovert. He had therapy through school from 3-5th grade ( he did not qualify before 3rd grade due to age/developmental appropriateness), but it did not really help (and he doubts it would have made a difference for earlier speech services) and it was discontinued since it did not seem to be impacting him in anyway (good grades, good social life, etc). Yes, in middle school and high school he was self-conscience about it- but as an adult it is only a rare concern for certain words/sounds (he avoids words he knows will give him trouble) and requires extra prep for presentations/speeches.Â
Edited by KCMichigan - 5/8/11 at 12:55pm