Hi!
Â
I am a speech teacher and special educator. I was searching the internet for discussions/opinions on use of iPad as speech output devices. My colleagues and I were just discussing (want to come up with rubric) comparing pros/cons of Dynavox-type products and iPads.
Â
You might be shocked to read this response- but please know I've owned both an iPad and an iPod for a year and a half so that I could see what/how I might use both in therapy with my students.
Â
My view on it (presently) is:
Â
1.) funding (for some families- this is a deciding factor)- and, as you know, currently apple products are not being covered by insurance.
Â
2.) If you decide to pay for an iPad out-of-pocket or your district has agreed to pay for it things to consider:
Â
        a.) it can't be brought home (b/c district owns it)
         b.) it will be given back to district when child ages out
         c.) durability- one crash to the floor can break much more easily than most Dynavox products....(you'd need a back-up in the meantime)Â
                    Similarly, Dyanvox warranties can last for 3-5 years but, apple products are  -tops 2 years. I've searched for refurbished apple products- very expensive  (usually 100.00 cheaper when refurbished- so, not a big savings there).
Â
         AND, MOST IMPORTANTLY ***** what is the FUNCTION of the device
         AND- what are your learner's abilities (perseverations)- ability to navigate or NOT
         navigate between pages?
Â
We (monthly speech meeting- speech therapists) discussed the NEED for an app that will "lock" students from navigating from page-to-page. We feel we should write to makers of Proloque2go and see if they can add this feature to their program.
Â
          At our recent monthly speech meeting, many of us (providers) were surprised and shocked the districts were appeasing parents with the idea that the district would buy their son/daughter and iPad and then would reduce speech services/related services under the assumption that learning would occur and child would learn at a much faster rate given the devices. We are finding that that is not the case and in many instances with students who perseverate or have difficulty with attention- the unlimited access to "fun" pages constantly competes with the voice-output pages that was the intended purpose of the device. Similarly, we agreed that- if the main purpose of the device is to help a user verbalize (thought voice output) basic wants and needs...the use of iPad versus other voice-output systems the iPad is not scoring high marks on the idea of the purpose of speech-output devices.Â
Â
          Sure, iPads are neat for other reasons and may work well with specific children with specific targets-but I have yet to see a user of iPad make good gains with independence of initiation and expression of language to request basic wants and needs.
Â
I appreciate others' comments and do applaud apple's innovation and really like many of the apps related to speech/language therapy....social skill buidling with videos- its capacity to take photos, voice-record, etc. I am specifically addresssing (above) its (ipad) use as voice-output.
Thanks! : )
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â