
If it was my 3 yo who wanted to play with just recently left toys (a couple of minutes?) I'd be sure to double check with the child who played with those toys just 2-3 minutes ago. "Are you done with the sand toys?" Because in my mind, a child who walked away for a couple of minutes hasn't necessarily abandoned the toys. Without this kind of double checking, I agree with the other mom--her child did have them first, and in his mind, hasn't gave away his turn yet. Not sure whether I would verbalise this though, in the situation--I can see the other child's perspective as well. To her, the toys were left alone, and she started playing with them. I'd try to make this point to my child--telling him that because he left the toys unattended, it was someone else's turn now, and he should wait for his.
Â
I also think that if someone is really upset over wanting a toy, it is not necesssarily a bad lesson to be empathetic and give up your turn.
Midnightwriter-
I agree that in theory it would be great to double check with the other child who left the items behind, but honestly at play dates/story times/park, etc. I'm already darn busy trying to keep an eye on my 1 yr old busy baby and my 3 year old. So to think about chasing down other kids to "check" in with them to see if they were okay with my DD picking up a left behind toy, I would say that it's unrealistic. And besides, I can't imagine that a pre-school teacher, or the like, would do this all day long with every child...right? So I get what you're saying and in certain situations, sure, I can do it, but it's not something I would do consistently nor do I feel it's necessary.Â
Â
I also agree that it's a good lesson in empathy to give up a coveted toy. My DD is a very empathetic child so I'm on board with this theory, but I also don't want to see her being the child who always feels empathy for an upset friend, causing her to always pass along something she is actively engaged with.Â
Â
Â










