Your mom's suggestion is a real possibility, but if it were me, I'd stick with the ballet. Â It's proven, whereas she actually might not like the science club (I mean, she probably would, but sometimes they surprise you heh). Â If you do the science club, there will be three weeks each month where you'll be thinking "we could have been dancing this week." Â If she was ambivalent, I'd have a harder decision, but if she loves the ballet and would hate to quit, then don't quit. Â I'm sure the science club will still be there next year, and maybe the schedules won't conflict then, right? Â Science learning is something that doesn't have to be done at any particular age, and much of what they do there you could easily do at home anyway (though certainly the idea of doing it in a 'club' is very appealing!!)... so there's no loss at ALL in the grand scheme of things if it's a year or two before she does the science club.
Â
But if dance is in her bones, then you want to encourage that. Â :) Â
Â
I'm speaking as the mother of a dancer, of course... Dance classes here start at age 3 (classes are for 3/4yo), but they often let kids in who are extra keen who are a little younger. Â My daughter started in September the year that she was to turn 3 in December... she's in her 2nd year now, does both ballet and tap (which is all that's offered for the 3/4s), and next year (when she can move up to the 5/6 year old classes which has more options) she wants to also do hip hop! Â I *know* how much she loves to dance, there's no way I would ever take it away from her even if there was something else she'd love... as long as she loves the dance MORE. Â :)
Â
I also am speaking as the mother of a son who has been in a ton of activities, and we had to pick and choose and pare down when he was doing too many. Â When he was 6 or 7, he was doing violin and karate and swimming and art classes and gymnastics and... and something else, I'm sure heh. Â When he moved from recreational into competitive gymnastics training, something had to go. Â We chose the violin... as much as it pained me to do so, because he had some talent AND because I'm a professional musician!! Â So of course I want my kids to follow in my footsteps. Â ;) Â But even though he had some talent and enjoyed it, it was definitely his least favourite activity. Â Not because he didn't like it, but just because he liked the others more... it was his lowest priority. Â
Â
For years, the competitive gymnastics was his #1 activity, while bit by bit the other activities fell by the wayside as the gymnastics took more and more time. Â And that was fine. Â We can't do everything.
Â
And now this year, at age 13, he's decided that he's finished with gymnastics. Â He still loves it, of course, but he's spent the last year (can't believe it's only been about a year, holy moly) rediscovering his musical side, and it's just exploded and taken over everything. Â He's now a percussionist, saxophone player, guitarist, and even lets me give him some piano lessons, played piano and classical guitar in the music festival this spring, plays in a school concert band and their jazz band too, the city band, the local youth orchestra, his church handbell choir... And he said "gymnastics is taking too much time away from my music." Â Heh.
Â
So... my point is, when he was your daughter's age we reluctantly abandoned the music because his heart was in gymnastics. Â He spent many great years in gymnastics and it was wonderful for him. Â Now he's found his calling in music (and I honestly think it is his calling) -- when he's READY for it now. Â :) Â There was no loss by not pursuing it in the intervening years... if anything, by not forcing him to continue when he wasn't completely enthusiastic, we never squashed his love for it. Â
Â
In other words, my point really is, there's no loss if you can't do everything all at once, especially when she's so young. Â Do what she will love the most right now, there's lots of time to 'catch up' on other things later. Â