or Connect
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Childhood and Beyond › Gentle Discipline › Spanking vs. violence.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Spanking vs. violence. - Page 10  

post #181 of 215

I thought your point was that spanking was "ew".  Sorry.

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by hakeber View Post





No kidding.  That was my point.

 

 



 

post #182 of 215



 

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2xy View Post



 

Not to prove you wrong. To bring attention to what the Bible really says.

 

You, yourself said that you don't remember much of the Bible, and I'm assuming that you are/were a Christian. I'm pretty sure that most people would have to look up scripture in order to properly quote it, no matter what their faith.

 

It's not hard. They can all be found in one place. I've debated about theology enough over the years to know where much of the dirt lies.

 

 

 



Oh good...I was getting a little paranoid there. winky.gif

 

post #183 of 215

I think she did if you'll look back to her earlier posts about safety within this thread?

But I really think we will all have to agree to disagreee on this because to her necessary is not to you necessary, am I right?

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by hakeber View Post


Can you give an example of when a spanking is necessary and could not have been dealt with in any other way?
 



 

post #184 of 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevaMajka View Post

I'm really disheartened that there are people who are defending spanking on the GENTLE DISCIPLINE board on mothering.com. I'm even more bothered by the fact that the posts that are advocating spanking are still here.

 

The Terms of Service say:

 

 


Well...has anyone reported the offensive posts? The mods don't read every single post.

 

post #185 of 215

I apologize for saying necessary, there are always other ways of dealing with a thing, but my uncle effectively and permanently impressed upon his child that running at moving vehicles was an absolutely unacceptable action that would have gotten her killed.

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by hakeber View Post


Can you give an example of when a spanking is necessary and could not have been dealt with in any other way?
 



 

post #186 of 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by hakeber View Post

Another reason is that consistency is key.  You mentioned that his older sister does get spanked still...is that something he is aware of?  could it be that he equates that with a sign of your love and devotion for her and so he wonders why he doesn't get the same treatment and maybe he thinks it's because you think he is too bad to respond to it?  I am just trying to think of why you have different techniques for two kids in the same house at the same time. 

 


I'm off to bed, so I just pulled this part. I seem to have posted something confusing again. I don't spank any of my kids. I haven't spanked ds1 in 12 or 13 years, and I haven't' ever spanked dd1 (hit her the time she pulled ds2's hair, and that's it). I don't spank ds2, either. And, I obviously don't spank dd2 - she's just a toddler.

 

post #187 of 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by Storm Bride View Post




I'm off to bed, so I just pulled this part. I seem to have posted something confusing again. I don't spank any of my kids. I haven't spanked ds1 in 12 or 13 years, and I haven't' ever spanked dd1 (hit her the time she pulled ds2's hair, and that's it). I don't spank ds2, either. And, I obviously don't spank dd2 - she's just a toddler.

 



ahhh okay.  misread that then.  That makes more sense.

 

eta: 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Storm Bride View Post


 In the meantime, ds2 isn't being hit - but dd1 is.


 


Just so you know I wasn't taking it out thin air.  What did you mean to say?


Edited by hakeber - 6/10/11 at 6:03am
post #188 of 215



 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dacks View Post

I apologize for saying necessary, there are always other ways of dealing with a thing, but my uncle effectively and permanently impressed upon his child that running at moving vehicles was an absolutely unacceptable action that would have gotten her killed.

 



 



That's all I've been trying to say.  It's not necessary.  There are lots and lots of ways of doing the same job without using a swat.  A swat may be faster, but it's not the only option.  That's all the GD board has ever been about at its core. 

 

post #189 of 215


I eat meat...if I could I would hunt. IDK it seems so natural to me to eat meat. However I am against the industrialization of meat. I get my meat from a local farm that practices a fast kill and stuns the animal so he doesn't feel it. They really take care of the animals and they are free ranging pastured animals.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dauphinette View Post

I had a feeling when I asked that that someone would it take it here, lol.

I wrote that I was asking genuinely because I was......asking genuinely.  I am trying to understand the whole non-violence argument.  I will admit that I find humorous that violence for some ends at animals, but I'm not going to judge you for it so you don't need to put words in my brain or spell out my motives before you give me a chance to explain them.

I guess I do feel like if you have a general sense of violence as a very fluid thing, just any generally oppressive action then to me that train of thought pulls into extending that respect for all living creatures but if it doesn't for you and you can seperate the two then great, you are just making my point for me.  If some people don't see violence towards or te killing of animals aqs a non-violence issue then it stands to PERFECT reason that some people, myself not included, might reasonably exclude spanking from their own list non-violence issues.  period done.

 



 



 

post #190 of 215


UMMM seriously? WHAT does that have to do with it not being violent? There are people who get turned on by circ too and it has to be a really tight circ with a dark scar. There are people who get turned on by rape too but well if they like it sooooooo much it must not be violent then right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dauphinette View Post

I didn't say they did say they felt loved by it.  And the friend is an adult, I said it was anecdotal, but I wanted to share because there actually are multitude of people in the world who like to spanked and I know my friend would not say that it's violent, I kinda tickled just typing that because she likes it soooo much.

 



 



 

post #191 of 215
I've been surprised by people saying the act of spanking, which is a physical blow to some degree or another, isn't a violent act, and now I'm surprised to see people saying it can be necessary. Running into the road is a supervision issue, not a discipline issue. You don't spank a 2-year-old and then let them play unsupervised next to the street, because they're too young to understand regardless of whether they were spanked or not. At some age they're old enough to understand it, but then they'll understand, spanked or not.
post #192 of 215
I really can't see how spanking could be considered non violent. The intention is to hurt the child in order for him not to forget that whatever he did was wrong. I am going to put a quote here that I consider a one of the best things I have ever read on non violence.

Nonviolence

Nonviolence belongs to a continuum from the personal to the global, and from the global to the personal. One of the most significant Buddhist interpretations of nonviolence concerns the application of this ideal to daily life. Nonviolence is not some exalted regimen that can be practiced only by a monk or a master; it also pertains to the way one interacts with a child, vacuums a carpet, or waits in line. Besides the more obvious forms of violence, whenever we separate ourselves from a given situation (for example, through inattentiveness, negative judgments, or impatience), we "kill" something valuable. However subtle it may be, such violence actually leaves victims in its wake: people, things, one's own composure, the moment itself. According to the Buddhist reckoning, these small-scale incidences of violence accumulate relentlessly, are multiplied on a social level, and become a source of the large-scale violence that can sweep down upon us so suddenly. . . . One need not wait until war is declared and bullets are flying to work for peace, Buddhism teaches. A more constant and equally urgent battle must be waged each day against the forces of one's own anger, carelessness, and self-absorption.

- Keneth Kraft, Inner Peace, World Peace
post #193 of 215



 

Quote:
Originally Posted by dauphinette View Post

I think she did if you'll look back to her earlier posts about safety within this thread?

But I really think we will all have to agree to disagreee on this because to her necessary is not to you necessary, am I right?

 


I still don't fully understand what your argument is, so it is hard for me to know if I even disagree with you at all.  Can YOU think of any examples it which it would be necessary to spank someone...even Dacks admitted that it wasn't really NECESSARY, it was merely effective...no one has ever argued the immediate effectiveness of spanking...the question is, did she already know that running into the street was dangerous (had that topic really never ever come up before?  living where it sounds like they did I find it either dubious or irresponsibole if it hadn't.)?  Did her desire to be with her father over ride her knowledge of avoiding the danger of the road?  Did a smack really teach her not to run into the road, or did it teach her not to chase after her father?  Who can really say?  It was effective in that she was never hit by a car, yes, but was it effective in addressing the child's feelings of separation anxiety?  Was it effective in making the child feel loved and protected?  Was it effective in teaching the child important coping mechanisms for when she feels anxious and has the urge to fly into danger to meet the need behind that terrorizing emotion?  Big feelings that cause a child to choose emotional reactions over physical preservation don't just disappear because they learn to listen to mom and dad, do they?

 

Equally, a smack on the hand and a NO works to teach a child that they will get a smack if they try to electrocute themselves...it does not teach them that sockets have electricity and what electricity does.  There are other ways of teaching this that can also be effective, and until that time when they can learn that lesson keeping kids in arms and in arms reach or in a protected play space is probably the best bet if you can't child proof...now if you have no time (as I said up thread a dozen times) and you are over worked and busy and you need to teach a toddler to fend for themselves in an unchildproofed home and you either cannot afford to childproof, or you unable to, and you will be leaving a toddler alone in dangerous spaces for extended periods of time...then yes, smacking IS probably your best option depending on the kid (whether or not they will listen, my brother would have been all the more determined to stick his fingers in the socket).  But none of the people the OP is dealing with is in that situation, so it's not really helpful, to this discussion, which was pointed out to me earlier. 

 

ETA:  I am not so daft as to assume there are no people in the world who ever are stretched beyond their limits.  That doesn't make spanking a best choice option and handy a tool. 


Edited by hakeber - 6/10/11 at 6:14am
post #194 of 215
I would never trust to leave a child who liked putting pennies in outlets alone around outlets no matter how many times they had been smacked or how severely. Does anyone really then trust a child around outlets? I question whether it's even effective, or whether parents figure out they have to watch better in addition to hitting their kids.
post #195 of 215



 

Quote:
Originally Posted by mamazee View Post

I would never trust to leave a child who liked putting pennies in outlets alone around outlets no matter how many times they had been smacked or how severely. Does anyone really then trust a child around outlets? I question whether it's even effective, or whether parents figure out they have to watch better in addition to hitting their kids.
 

Exactly!  Was my ironic tone above not clear?

post #196 of 215
No, I coudn't tell, but it's hard to get tone on the internet. I didn't think that sounded like you.
post #197 of 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by mamazee View Post

No, I coudn't tell, but it's hard to get tone on the internet. I didn't think that sounded like you.



hmmmmm...I always forget people can't see my eyebrows when I type...and the emoticons always feel a little too emotive to make the subtle point I am going for. 

 

Okay, then to be clear, in post number 193, I was being ironic...no matter what the situation of your life, leaving a child to fend for themselves in an unsupervised dangerous area is not the best option...or necessary, or effective parenting, not even close.  Even if you have smacked their bottom or hands a thousand times and you are sure they get it.  It still doesn't make electric outlets safe for kids who are prone to putting pennies in them...you probably should hide the pennies, too, since a kid who puts pennies in outlets probably isn't too far off from trying to swallow them either.

 

ETA: This doesn't mean that our parents were bad unloving poor parents.  That doesn't mean there is no room for improvement or doing things better. 

post #198 of 215
Can I just say, when I'd tried multiple different socket protectors and my DS managed to figure them all out, I was tempted to try the swat on the hand thing. Nothing was working and he was getting into trouble even when he was arm's reach away from me, he was just so quick. I was afraid for his life.

So I can understand the temptation. I think we all do, I think almost every parent has reached that utter frustration/anger/fear level at some point. But there are other options. With the outlets, like a pp said, move furniture in front of them. Turn off the power to certain outlets, if possible. What we did was rewire all the outlets with internal safety shutters. We really didn't have the time or money to do that, but it made a whole lot more sense to me than hitting my child!

I don't know that I'd hand my child a pile of pennies if I knew he was going to stick them in outlets...

*sigh*

There are just so many other ways to deal with these situations.

I don't even know why some of these posts are up. It is painful for me to read people advocating and justifying hitting a child. I do think it's abuse. Obviously it's on one end of a spectrum and it's not the same thing as more extreme forms of abuse (and I've experienced all ends of the spectrum myself), and I don't necessarily blame parents if they know no other way -- many of us just do what we were taught to do, what people around us do, etc. But I really wish things could change on a society level. I don't understand why children from age 2-7 (or whatever the 'acceptable' age range to spank is eyesroll.gif) lack that basic right to physical safety that the whole rest of society is granted.
post #199 of 215

I had a woman from the church I grew up in (who is commended at how well behaved and successful her children grew up to be) "advise me" I was doing my DD an injustice in not spanking her....I asked what age she starts spanking and she replied "6 months". I nearly vomited. She is labeled successful as a parent b/c all her kids moved out at 18 and either got married right away or went to college. Everyone has their own opinion on when it is "acceptable" to hit a child (or never).

 

I don't understand why it became acceptable in the first place. I am "religious" and get told all the time I have to hit my child according to The Bible yet I have never seen any proof of that. The proverbs are referred to a lot..Yes I have read them. A rod was a stick used to guide sheep...If you spare the rod spoil the child and replace your interpretation of rod as a beating stick with guidance then it isn't about hitting is it? There is one about striking a child with the rod and leaving a bruise though and that one is kind of tricky research has led me to a few different things 1. it was against the law to strike a slave with the rod b/c it would kill him (so obviously it would kill a child) 2. you weren't considered a child until you were weaned (which was far from 1 y/o in those times) but nonetheless it is still a tricky one...this site has more info for people of religion using The Bible as an excuse to spank http://aolff.org/ and has a lot about scriptures and there meanings and literal interpretations.

post #200 of 215

This conversation reminded me of my extremely devout and VERY sweet friends (evangelical HSing Christians) who had THE nicest, friendly and sweet (and from all appearances, happy) kids.....they had this book and the only phrase that I remember from it was "to train up a child" - so I Googled that to see if it would lead me to the book. WOW. I don't know if this is the exact book that my friends used, but let me say again WOW

 

http://www.amazon.com/Train-Up-Child-Michael-Pearl/dp/1892112000

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Gentle Discipline
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Childhood and Beyond › Gentle Discipline › Spanking vs. violence.