Quote:
Originally Posted by
ThandiweÂ

Â
I can see we differ in opinion. Because a 5-point allows for a lesser amount of head excursion, the likelihood of neck/spinal injuries are reduced. Even race car drivers use seatbelts with more points of contact. The greater the amounts of contact, the better the weight is distributed.Â
Â
Actually, that is incorrect. Comparing race cars to car seats is apples to oranges. Race car drivers harnesses are attached to the car frame. Not strapped in with another belt that is attached to the car frame. And, race car drivers have a HANS devices that helps prevent too strong of a neck load. Children in 5 point harnesses do not have those. (Dave Earnhart was one of the famous Nascar drivers that died from head injuries that a HANS device may have prevented).
Â
There are 2 sides to this issue. The Swedes argue the side that harnessing ffing increases neck loads because the shoulders are held back while the head and neck go flying forward in a 5 point harness. They believe that a booster is safer because it allows the torso to move forward a bit more with the head. The other side is that a 5 point harness is better because it holds ones body in position better. There are no studies to back this up either way. We know that they are both safe options for older children who are mature enough to sit in a booster properly. IMO, a 5 point harness with a HANS device would probably be safer, but that is not an option. So, IMO, one should rf as long as possible to avoid the issue of ffing harnessing, hopefully being able to ride rfing until mature enough for a booster. In an ideal world, anyways.
Â
Â