or Connect
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Baby › Baby Health › Vaccinations › I'm Not Vaccinating › NEW STUDY: Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

NEW STUDY: Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given.

post #1 of 19
Thread Starter 

 

The following article was published on May 4, 2011 in the Human and Experimental Toxicology and it confirms exactly the suspicion I have had for years.  The more vaccines, the higher the risk of death.

 

http://het.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/05/04/0960327111407644.full.pdf+html

 

This article is really important!  These authors not only found a statistically significant correlation between vaccine dose requirments and poor infant mortality rates, but they also found mislabeling of infant deaths that should have been SIDS, instead being labeled as suffocation.  Once they looked at the data and adjusted for mislabeled deaths they found that there had been NO change in SIDS deaths because of the "back laying" supported by the AAP and instead the rates remain incredibly high.  This is really unnerving, because if the datas are being recorded wrong it is impossible for scientists to make good judgement calls in terms of weighing risk vs. benefits of medical treatments.  This raises the question of WHY did SIDS come into existence at the same time mass vacation in childhood was introduced and why has it only gotten worse not better?

 

They also touched on the fact that since the advent of the Rotavirus vaccine, more children have died from pneumonnia suggesting that rotavirus may be an important illness for a childs immune system to fight, in order to prevent a much worse and more lethal pneumonnia infection.

 

Just wanted to share :))

post #2 of 19

.


Edited by member234098 - 6/3/12 at 2:25pm
post #3 of 19

Miriam, thanks for the info about labor analgesics. This is an area that deserves more research as well.

post #4 of 19

.


Edited by member234098 - 6/3/12 at 2:24pm
post #5 of 19

Thank you, excellent article.

post #6 of 19

Interesting article! Thank you for sharing. Makes me even more resolute in my decision.

post #7 of 19
Thread Starter 

oh my!  i wish they would study the long term effects of labor analgesics on infants!!  that is soo interesting! 

post #8 of 19

I remember reading a book almost 9 years ago before my daughter was born and they showed that when Japan stopped vaccinating children before age 2 (country wide) that SIDS plummetted to NONE!

post #9 of 19

Not one bit surprising!!

post #10 of 19

Was this study ever actually published in the journal? I can't see it listed in the contents for May, June or July.

 

I think that anyone can actually submit an article, but that not all meet the criteria for publication? I wonder why this one wasn't accepted? Perhaps because the authors are both strongly anti-vax and their data doesn't hold up to peer review? I'd be interested to learn more from someone more knowledgeable. :)

 

 

post #11 of 19


Edited by member234098 - 6/3/12 at 2:23pm
post #12 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by miriam View Post

You do not think the authors of this study are knowledgeable? Why? 


 

Actually, I asked if someone more knowledgeable than me could shed any light on why, after peer review, this article wasn't selected for publication in the journal. By 'someone', I meant someone reading this forum. HTH smile.gif

 

I'm quite sure that the authors are knowledgeable, but they do have a clear anti-vax bias. Hence my query.

 

 

post #13 of 19

.


Edited by member234098 - 6/3/12 at 2:24pm
post #14 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by miriam View Post

I posted the same study on the Vaccinations forum on June 4, 2011 as posted in my previous post on this thread.

 

This is the I am not Vaccinating forum, so the discussion would flow differently.


 

Are we not allowed to ask the question, 'Is this good research?' in this forum? Why wouldn't a reasonably intelligent non-vaxer ask that question?

 

But thank you for pointing me to the other thread. I'll go take a look there.

post #15 of 19

 Harvard Medical School's Dr. Marcia Angell, The Truth About The Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us And What To Do About It.

 

http://ethicalnag.org/2009/11/09/nejm-editor/


Edited by member234098 - 6/3/12 at 2:22pm
post #16 of 19
Thread Starter 
post #17 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenimBebek View Post

It shows up on their website as being published in May 4, 2011

http://het.sagepub.com/search/results?fulltext=vaccines+infant+mortality&x=0&y=0&submit=yes&journal_set=sphet&src=selected&andorexactfulltext=and



But it's not listed in the contents of the May issue? It seems to have been submitted but not selected for publication. I'm wondering why?
post #18 of 19

.


Edited by member234098 - 6/2/12 at 1:17pm
post #19 of 19

The website says "

 

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: I'm Not Vaccinating
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Baby › Baby Health › Vaccinations › I'm Not Vaccinating › NEW STUDY: Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given.