I'll assume your post was to generate questions and conversation and not to attack without substantiating facts.
Â
Depending on your target population - as a quantitative person, you should recognize the difference between causation and correlation. Before making such dramatic generalities would recommend that you consider the full picture, rather than assume a limited causation relationship.
Â
An alternative perspective - when my daughter was about 1 1/2, I met with a couple of educators with the specific question - if I were to spend the extra money in the first 6 years of education or the last 6 years, the consensus opinion was the first 6 years. Anecdotallly, they were able to recognize those who were Montessori educated as more self-sufficient, self-directed, etc. Note - these were high school teachers.
Â
Granted, it must be recognized that parents who send their children to Montessori are especially involved in their children's development so the Montessori cannot be assumed to be the sole reason for successful students in high school.
Â
I have to admit, I'm a bit skeptical of a professional asking other professionals - "so, you were a Montessori or Waldoft student?" - I'm sure that is not the approach you took, but again, seems a bit suspect that a brand new participant to this forum would make such a dramatic statement without taking into consideration all of the factors involved with a person's education and subsequent professional career.
Â
Â