Quote:
Originally Posted by
miriamÂ

The article said that their paediatrician approved of their alternative formula. Â Why isn't the paediatrician in jail for child abuse and neglect if the formula is insufficient? Â Isn't he the hired, paid, educated consultant here? Â The professional who knows all, tells all?
Â
I agree she should be breastfeeding or find a wetnurse/donor millk.
Â
The parents appeared, according to the article, to be in sync with all that was advised and all that is legal. Â
Â
Maybe something is missing, but the prima facia evidence is that the parents did nothing wrong. Â
Â
In my never to be humble opinion and lifelong experience with both sides of CPS, the agency acts on the evidence they are given and never apologize as they have no real legal liability. Â Wonder who reported the parents?
Â
You really think that does not happen? Â Have you read the Godboldo case? Â
Well the parents say the pediatrician approved anyway. Â I have trouble believing that a doctor would ever approve of something so obviously not in line with an infant's nutritional needs, and if it did happen, I certainly hope that he is being investigated too. Â I can see a possible scenario where the "approval" was actually the doctor arguing that it was a very bad idea for a bit, realizing that the parents were not going to be convinced, and saying "okay, well if that's what you really want to do, it's your choice" Â and calling child services as soon as they were gone. Â
Â
I do not believe the parents intended any harm to their child, but they were feeding him a dangerously inappropriate diet, so yes, they were doing something very wrong.Â
Â
Wanting a child on a medication that is generally appropriate for her mental illness and has helped many others is not at all the same as randomly deffilibrating a perfectly healthy child who doesn't need it. Â Taking a child off a medication that does not appear to be helping but is causing unpleasant side effects is not even in the same ballpark as failing to meet an infant's basic nutritional needs. Â
Â
I do wonder if there is a bit more to the Goboldo case than she is admitting, but I don't doubt that even if she didn't tell the whole story, the authorities acted wrongly to begin with. Â She made it a million times worse when instead of calling a lawyer she pulled out a gun and fired a shot, though. Â But the case really isn't comparable. Â It's unlikely that taking her daughter off the medicine would be life threatening or cause permanent harm, both potential results for the diet the baby was being fed. Â
Â
There have been a number of cases of kids dying of diabetes or other treatable conditions because parents chose prayer over medicine, or of infants starving to death due to being put on unsuitable diets and medically neglected. Â If only CPS had intervened in those cases, Mike Adams would now be screaming about a lack of respect for parental rights for them too, but the kids would still be alive. Â I'm glad we got Mike Adams screaming in this case instead of another "parents watch obliviously as baby starves to death" headline. Â
Â