
I am well aware measles is highly contagious. Â It is one of the few vaccines I even come close to waffling over. Â
Â
That being said I was objecting to the "close to 100%". Â That is quite the claim! Â There is no way to know what the measles rate would be if people did not vax. Â The world changes, heck diseases change (and many of them have cycles, some die out, new one are born or increase in rates...). Â
Â
Comparing it to the way it hit the New World in the 1700's is bizarre.
Plenty of studies show that measles vaccination is quite effective in preventing measles.  Prior to the introduction of the vaccine, it was true that close to 100% of people got it at some point in their life, mostly in childhood.  This was after improved food availability, less crowding, better sanitary practices etc. had greatly reduced mortality for measles and many other diseases, and modern sewage treatment had pretty much eliminated typhoid and disease spread by dirty water/food.  Yet measles, while not nearly as deadly as it had been, still  spread like wildfire. Â
Â
This changed very quickly after the introduction of the vaccine, and very soon after measles was quite uncommon. Â Outbreaks in the 1980s (still small enough that the vast majority of people didn't get measles, but big enough to see i was still being spread around the population) showed we needed a higher percentage of immune people for herd immunity, adding a second vaccine which produced immunity in many of of those who had failed to develop it after the first vaccine solved this problem and lead to measles eventually being declared eliminated from the US. Â We do still have imported cases, but the high level of immune individuals prevents it from spreading very far.Â
Â
Measles is still very common in third world countries with low levels of vaccination, but recent vaccination campaigns have greatly reduced rates of measles and measles deaths. Â On the other hand, falling rates of vaccination in parts of Europe has resulted in measles making a comeback with many large outbreaks. Â France this year had had thousands of cases with hundreds of serious complications and six deaths (as of the last article I read about it, which was a month or two ago). Â France is hardly a third world country, rates of death/complications are probably quite similar to what we would expect from measles if we had large outbreaks here. Â
Â
So given all this, what reasons are there to believe that measles wouldn't quickly become a common disease which pretty much everyone got again if we stopped suddenly vaccinating?
Â
True, comparing it to measles in the 1700s does not really work. Â Then it was hitting a completely unprepared population where none of the adults were immune. Â Now if we quit vaccinating children today, while a few unfortunate adults who had never been vaccinated or the small percent whose vaccines fail to produce immunity would be vulnerable, most adults would be protected either by natural infection for older adults or vaccination for younger adults, teens, and children old enough to have been born when vaccination was still common. Â It would mostly be young children who got it, just as it always has been. Â Â
Â
Â







 100% is quite the number and I think you can understand my initial skepticism. Â



