I believe the first and most important thing for doing art is to play with the materials. Â That's it.
Â
 I didn't read this idea, though I don't claim it to be original.  I arrived at it thinking about my own experience with art in school.  I always expected it to be realistic.  I had pretty good control over my pencil, so my drawings and handwriting were always neater than other kids in my grade.  When we tried to paint, I had a really tough time controlling the paint, and this frustrated me.  I didn't learn or play with the qualities unique to each material.
Â
Each material limits and guides what can be done and how. Â Playing with materials without a rigid goal teaches these qualities without any additional instruction from a "teacher". Â This seems easier to do with really young kids, as older kids can get caught up in turning a material into something they've thought of before hand. Â This works once you have experience with a material because you understand how it works. Â But in the beginning we don't have this understanding. Â It's hard for many older kids and adults to empty their minds and explore.
Â
If I had children 10 years ago, I might not have introduced watercolors early. Â I hated the way the trays got muddied and brown. Â Nothing ever looked the way I wanted. Â When my daughter was 2, I discovered Stockmar watercolors and read about the Waldorf philosophy of introducing art by using materials that discouraged LINES. Â Even though I am not a Waldorf parent, the theory reminded me of my own expectations (and limitations) as a kid. Â So, using two colors and a good, 1/2- 3/4 inch nylon-bristle watercolor brush (the natural bristles were too expensive or too coarse for my taste) we let her play. Â The colors on the wetted paper were ACTIVE! Â They bled and blended in gorgeous ways. Â She added tons of paint to every picture, so we used the heaviest watercolor paper we could afford. Â Unlike Crayola, the colors were deep and vibrant and rich. Â (And after several years tacked to the wall, they are still vibrant.)
Â
Well, I don't know that it turned her into an artist. Â My oldest (now 6.5) struggles with fine motor control with her hands, and likes to copy things rather than to create something out of the blue. Â But then one day she drew a rooster (with colored pencils) over and over on the page. Â She seemed encouraged when I mentioned that artists would call this a study. Â Now she is playing with the digital camera. Â Eventually we'd like to get muddy with some clay, but that isn't happening really soon.
Â
DD2 (4.5) seems to have a real artistic sense (very common at this age). Â Her hand is confident and strong, and she handles her pencils and crayons better at 4.5 than DD1 does now. Â The way she moves her hand while doing her big drawings looks so much like how an experienced artist works. Â We'll see how it unfolds. Â Hopefully we can experiment with more materials as the years go by. Â I'm sure we'll have fun.
Â
Besides books on Waldorf painting, I really like the book "Art Fun!" which we discovered at our library. Â Unlike most books that show a project for you to copy, it focuses on materials and techniques. Â Yes, it shows examples, but somehow manages to convey the sense (to me at least) that you have the freedom to make this truly your own. Â Perhaps because it rarely states, "Make this fun purse!" or whatever. Â I'm sorry, but i didn't note the author.
Â
Â
Â
Â