Lack of veiny breasts....normal?

[SilverMoon010]

I'm 9w4d and I know with my DS I surely had the veiny breasts (don't recall when they showed though, thinking definitely in the first tri). I noticed this pregnancy, I don't have that.  I know all pregnancies are different but would assume the veiny-breast thing occured in all pregnancies.  I've had other first tri symptoms (though much milder than with my DS) so I'm not stressing over this but was wondering if others have experienced a lack of veiny breasts during their pregnancy, particularly early pregnancy like where I am, and everything was fine.

[Abraisme]

My breasts have done something different with each pregnancy.  I'm sure it's totally fine and within a normal range. 

[amberskyfire]

I am pale as a sheet and blond and have been pregnant 5 times. I've never had the veiny boobs. It probably varies from pregnancy to pregnancy.

[Mommel]

I'm an extremely pale and freckly redhead (not ginger, just light auburn)... like one step away from being see-through. LOL This might be TMI, but whatever... I don't even have areolas normally. I have a teeny bit of spotty pigmentation around my still very pink nipples at almost 8 mos. pregnant, but no veiny breasts... *shrug* Everyone told me I'd get brown nipples and big, dark areolas and visible veins and linea nigra, blah, blah, blah... but NOPE. My friends call me Whitey McWhite-White, and pregnancy hasn't changed that one bit. If anything, I've gotten a bit red in places, but that's it.