Hi. I have never had much interest in EC and we tried it a couple times when my daughter was first born and it didn't work out (she would hold her poop for a few hours if we tried holding over the toilet and I wasn't comfortable with that - and honestly just not interested enough to keep trying). However, she tested positive for kidney/urinary reflux. I had this as a child too, so my children have a strong genetic risk which is why they are tested as newborns. The standard treatment is low dose antibiotics, but we opted for probiotics (one promising study showed these were just as effective at keeping infections at bay) and breastfeeding instead. She did great for a year, but then she got an unexplained fever and we had to take her in. The problem is that in infants their preferred method of testing for a bladder infection is doing it by catheter. Doing a bag gives a high rate of false positives (50%), and a significant rate of false negatives (10%). With her condition those are not acceptable rates. The problem with a catheter though is that the procedure is invasive and traumatic. When I took her in I asked what they do to protect the child from distress and the doctor said, "nothing, we hold them down and hold their legs apart and they scream and cry, and we do it as fast as we can". I told the doctor that these procedures traumatized me as a child and she said, "I can understand that, but it has to be done". I asked for sedation and was told the risks were too high. Then I asked for Nitrous Oxide and was told that was a possibility but they had to see if a certified nurse was on staff. I ended up waiting 40 minutes for a nurse to come on shift who could administer the Nitrous Oxide. The whole thing went very well and they did the catheter without her barely noticing, and they had to draw blood and start an IV and the Nitrous swelled her veins a bit so that was easier to do too. The only problem is that she fought the mask and seemed distressed that it was being held over her face. I feel that is better than fighting a catheter, but of course if I can prevent both I'd like to try. So that brings me to the question of EC. I looked up methods of collecting urine and an accurate method is called a "clean catch" method. This involves sterilizing the infants bottoms and catching the urine midstream. Do you think that is even possible with an older baby? It says to do this after a feeding, but it's not like at 12 months old she really has a "feeding" anymore? Is it possible to EC her at this age? I would like to be able to test her urine without doing an invasive procedure on her. She is on antibiotics for 10 days now and then we have to retest. The nurse said we could do a bag collection, but looking at how bad the rates of a false negative or positive are, it might be nice to try to do a clean catch instead.
Mothering › Mothering Discussion Forums › Natural Family Living › Diapering › Elimination Communication › Help! Is it possible to EC a 12 month old for medical condition?
Help! Is it possible to EC a 12 month old for medical condition?
Mothering › Mothering Discussion Forums › Natural Family Living › Diapering › Elimination Communication › Help! Is it possible to EC a 12 month old for medical condition?









Follow Mothering