Â
Â
i can explain about the "tomboy."Â i'm sure other folks know what spirit in which you mean it, but it's kind of offensive in a few ways (not to shame you mamas):
it implies that when a child people view as female does certain activities, the activities are supposed pertain to a child that people view as male. that kind of indicates a division or sets up the implication that some things are for boys and some things are for girls.Â
i prefer to think of all activities, toys, colors, etc. as for everybody, not set up along a binary. the term also implies that there's something atypical about a girl child who engages in things like treeclimbing, and i think it reenforces stereotypes and rigid gender roles, and discourages children of all sexes from participating in an activity based upon for whom the activity is intended. just some ideas that are pretty incorrect and outdated and something to hope to move beyond, right?
Â
Â
I used the term because there are those who do use it to refer to a girl (again the same as the neighbor boys family) that think the same of girls and the fear that they will be come a certain way- I hear the term often--it doesn't make it right or acceptable but it is use by many to mean as you stated
Â
it was to show the contrast in context to this issue
Â
 it offensive but it's certainly used to describe as mentioned












