More medical science insanity: Delay breastfeeding and modify gut biota to increase vaccine response

[Mirzam]

http://www.gaia-health.com/articles501/000527-delay-breast-feeding-vaccines.shtml#.Tm0EL0bkOXM

Children in poor countries do not develop as many antibodies as those in wealthy nations. Rather than ask whether it may be an indication that their bodies are refusing for a good reason, medical researchers assume that it's bad. Therefore, they're making a couple of the most inane suggestions imaginable.

[Asiago]

I am speechless  

[littlec]

I am no scientific researcher or medical professional, but if breastmilk prevents the live virus vaccine from working, wouldn't it prevent the actual virus in the person being breastfed?

[Mirzam]

Originally Posted by littlec 

I am no scientific researcher or medical professional, but if breastmilk prevents the live virus vaccine from working, wouldn't it prevent the actual virus in the person being breastfed?

Conventional medicine views a vaccine's success by the antibody response, a low level antibody isn't good (in their eyes), so if they can do something, however conterintuitive it might be, to increase a response they assume this is a good thing, especially as they hold the arrogant view that medical science is superior to Mother Nature. As the article states:

They [Big Pharma] have an artificial way of determining whether vaccines are effective—and they're locked into that system. They measure antibodies to their vaccine, and if they reach a certain arbitrary level, they say that the vaccination is successful. It's rather clever, because it nicely evades having to demonstrate that people are actually immune from the diseases.