http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-05/uot-tvm051805.php
Â
So it's a small sample size (only 97) but it's the best we've got. And heck, at least someone took time to research it.Â
Â
Thoughts?
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-05/uot-tvm051805.php
Â
So it's a small sample size (only 97) but it's the best we've got. And heck, at least someone took time to research it.Â
Â
Thoughts?
I am not surprised.
Â
The goal of the studies was to see if people could be convinced to vaccinate, right? Â
Â
I wonder how successful a naturopath or someone who had a vaccine injured child would be at convincing a crowd of ardent pro-vaxxers that they should not vax? Â Not very, I think.
Â
We all think we have right on our side, or else we wouldn't be on that side.
Â
For myself, I am much more likely to change my mind when real conversation takes place - and conversation that acknowledges points on both sides. Â Sceaming one side louder and that "you are just wrong!" Â is not going to get anyone anywhere.
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â