or Connect
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Baby › Baby Health › Vaccinations › Vaccines, Eugenics, and Dr.Sherri Tenpenny
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Vaccines, Eugenics, and Dr.Sherri Tenpenny - Page 6

post #101 of 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buzzer Beater View Post

I don't assume "any" other view is wrong. I assume that OP has read some things that scared her and she is passing on that information- she's talked about eugenics/population control, vaccines, big pharma, cancer, mainstream doctors, Nazis, the Bush family, extreme environmentalists, aspartame, fluoride, managed health care, GMOs, forced sterilization and Bill Gates all in a few breaths! She sounds overwhelmed.

 

 

Blue mind.

 

First you made comments about teasing fact from fiction, and now you make comments about her being overwhelmed....

 

Let's not patronise each and other; let's keep it to the topic at hand.

 

I agree with a lot of what the OP has to say but not necessarily her conclusions.  I think the point I made about "dead people don't buy drugs"  and another poster made on  "why isn't the population decreasing?" are quite relevant to the discussion.  Speculations about her state of being are not.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

post #102 of 107
Thread Starter 

Kathy, I would never think you were mocking me. Your posts are always thoughtful and kind. I know you are genuine!

 

Well, I am not sure why they want to lower population. I don't put it past them, and this is why I think they might be doing it......

 At the top of this, you have a small amount of very wealthy, powerful people, who think it is their duty? place? to talk about world affairs. The Bilderberg conference is one example. (Then, you have the Bohemian Grove retreat, which is a whole different animal lol!!) Anyways, the elite we'll call them, have been known to talk about eugenics/population control and world governments throughout history. Even Bill Gates talks about it, although he tries to take a positive approach. The end, though, still points to lower population.

 

Considering these elites are often the heads of these large corporations, and are already wealthy, I feel they have turned their attention onto population control.  We all know Ted Turner's opinion lol. They might not worry about billions of people to buy their products, since they are already wealthy. Since control and extreme wealth go hand in hand. So, a lust for control might be one reason. If there are less people, they will be easier to control, using food, electricity, medicine, money, regulations, police state, etc. The elites and their corporations will still be wealthy, even with less people. Tyrannical governments have existed in the past, and some exist to this day. Right now, the population is enormous and uncontrollable.

 

Another reason might be their love for the environment, and the carrying capacity: The carrying capacity of a biological species in an environment is the maximum population size of the species that the environment can sustain indefinitely, given the food, habitat, water and other necessities available in the environment. In population biology, carrying capacity is defined as the environment's maximal load, which is different from the concept of population equilibrium.

 

These elites, often turned environmentalists, might feel the world population needs to be reduced in order to protect the planet, animals, and even each other. Too many people=disaster, so they try to find ways to reduce the population. The ways must be secret, because nobody will line up for voluntary sterilization! We see a trend in the world, pushing the theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW)--meaning, human bad, killing planet. Must have less people, or else planet die! 

How about that human population counter a few posts back? Is this meant to encourage people to support a lower world population?

 

Notice, I don't have the answers. I only take what I've read, and for me, population control seems to make the most sense. There could be several reasons why they want to cull the population--maybe one is true, maybe all, or maybe there's a reason I haven't thought of.  It's just too hard to ignore history, full of killings, corruption, and sadness. I don't think it has gone away, but they've gotten better with hiding it.

post #103 of 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by kathymuggle View Post

Blue mind.

 

First you made comments about teasing fact from fiction, and now you make comments about her being overwhelmed....

 

Let's not patronise each and other; let's keep it to the topic at hand.

 

I agree with a lot of what the OP has to say but not necessarily her conclusions.  I think the point I made about "dead people don't buy drugs"  and another poster made on  "why isn't the population decreasing?" are quite relevant to the discussion.  Speculations about her state of being are not.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Regarding those points, my answers (which are not necessarily my beliefs, but are how I understand these theories) are:

For wanting a reduced population - fewer people are easier to control than many.  

For the question of why isn't the population decreasing - either, yes, the strategies theorized are not working well, are more long-term goals than short-term, or perhaps the population is actually not increasing but we are told it is.  After all, we pretty much have to accept population numbers as "they" tell us.  Again, this isn't what I believe, but I don't think it's that preposterous either.

 

post #104 of 107
Thread Starter 

Buzzer Beater, you are correct. This information is overwhelming, there's no question about that. The only difference is that I believe it's intentional, not accidental or purely greed-driven. The information exists, and it probably doesn't matter why. I just dwell on the why and how a little too much.

 

In the end though, we all should work to support what is right, and that's my motivation for posting. To raise awareness and try to make positive changes. Hey, we stopped x-raying pregnant women, right? And, some places allow VBAC's. We don't drug and strap down laboring women, or do routine episiotomies. Let the cord finish pulsing, allow water births, birth freedom in general......ending slavery, desegregating schools, voters' rights is another good one.

 

Maybe I should make a list of all the positive changes that have come from activism. We still have a long way to go though!

post #105 of 107

Thanks BeckyBird for persevering--in both your research and this thread! You have very gracefully managed to pass along lots of information in spite of numerous distractions. I'm very grateful.

post #106 of 107
Thread Starter 

Thank you Annjo! love.gif

post #107 of 107
Thread Starter 

More from Dr. Tenpenny, for anyone who is still interested in this subject. She once again talks about her view of the depopulation agenda.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Od7B79q_58s  Fast forward to 8 minutes for her interview.

 

 

While speaking about flu vaccines, how they don't work, cause adverse affects, etc, she says,

"How could they be so negligent? They can't. They can't be that negligent. It has to have an element of intent."   http://www.youtube.com/user/astonisher1#p/c/CCAC240DE22298FA/2/Od7B79q_58s

 

 

 

This lady also speaks about the subject of eugenics in our country today. Former pharmaceutical sales rep, Gwen Olsen. Here's her site. http://www.gwenolsen.com/

Here's her interview with Mike Adams, where she talks about eugenics. You can take her expertise into consideration, or you can listen to the messages sent out from the pharmaceutical giants, the media (who is totally bought out) or, ha, the government. All one in the same.

http://www.youtube.com/user/astonisher1#p/c/3D19AFF208048E01/22/SwHGdRbHJuc

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Vaccinations
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Baby › Baby Health › Vaccinations › Vaccines, Eugenics, and Dr.Sherri Tenpenny