When I logged on, I expected the worst. Thankfully, you all have proven me wrong! So, where to begin....
1. Instead of using the term "eugenics", maybe we can use the blanket term "population control". Dr.Tenpenny used the term "eugenics", and this is why I repeated the term. Actually, to insert another one of my theories here, and to address super single mama, I do think this is still a form of eugenics. Eugenics upon the entire human race. Meaning, if you target an entire population with infertility and cancer/disease causing chemicals (from vaccines, plastics, GMO food, fluoride, etc. too many to list) then it will affect a large portion of the human race--the "useless eaters", the economic burdens. Eugenics in the sense that only the strongest of the race will survive.
Where am I getting the info? How can I come to this insane conclusion? There are some people who openly believe the earth would be better off without 90% of the population: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1608026/posts
Professor Pianka and his speech at the Texas Academy of Science. Ebola virus would be a good way to reduce population.
Georgia Guidestones.....a mysterious stone monument in Georgia, openly stating the desire to have a small world population (500 million). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones The state now owns the land, and I wonder who maintains the land around the monument? Do they condone the message on the monument, about a reduced population? If I were to erect a crazy monument, then sell the land to my state, would they cut the grass for me? No way.
2. WildKingdom, it is only your belief that technology has not advanced this far, but you don't know this for sure. Your theory, and nothing more.
3. Fluoride causes bone cancer, yay! It dumbs you down, awesome! So, let's work to get it out of our water, shall we? You do know the Nazis used fluoride in their camps, right? And, how the very leader of our country--Bush--was by every sense a Nazi! I am not making this up, but I do base my theories upon these facts.
4.Do yourself a favor, and read the links about Holdren, whom Barack Obama had appointed Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Everywhere you look, there are folks in power who desire to lower the population.
5.WildKingdom, you are a doctor. Do you ever ask your patients about their diet? Do you ever promote healthy nutrition, and a diet free from GMOs, aspartame, chemicals, even soy (which is almost all GMO)? I'm asking because I feel very discouraged by our medical system. My relative with the brain tumor has been seen by many doctors, and she is never asked about her diet. When I've taken my son to the doctor, they never asked about his diet. They only do vaccines and prescriptions, it seems. I do hope you are one of the rare doctors who knows the importance of healthy nutrition along with conventional care.
**This does not mean that all docs are bad, or are in on this grand scheme to help control the population. No way. Doctors are great people, who want to help their patients. I even made a post where I said that peds who fire their non-vax patients are not so bad, that they are doing what they believe is right. But, considering they hold licenses, and must practice medicine along certain guidelines, I feel many doctors are limited in the care they can give. Look to the top--to the people who make the policies which the doctors must follow. At the very top of the chain, you will find the problem. **
I have so much more to write, and I'll be back later.