Quote:
Originally Posted by
aeterna 
Yeah, I know that some people around here are uncomfortable with u/s, I just really do not understand WHY. I mean, as far as the list of potential tests or procedures to put a pregnant woman through, it just really seems to be the least offensive possible intervention. No samples, noninvasive, not painful, not restrictive, not dangerous, no artificial manipulation of body chemistry... I've perused the list of potential objections (as commonly identified on this forum) and I just don't see where it fits in.
Well, as far as potential tests or procedures, I'd far rather submit to a blood draw from my arm, which I have experience with, know is going to hurt a little bit, might bruise, but the risks are pretty low as far as permanent damage is concerned. With u/s, the risks are truly unknown. "No proof of harm" is not the same as "proof of no harm". We know that it is virtually untested, that it was put into practice on women after being developed to study metal fatigue, we know that it has the potential to cause harm, and we truly have no idea what damage it does - since no long term studies have been done. It definitely has the potential to do harm. And that potentiality is what many mamas object to. Why risk that potentiality if you don't need to? What information are you going to get from the test, and what are you going to do with that information? It's a risk/benefit analysis, and in the long term every woman/family has to make that determination for itself. However, I'll say that because it is a socially expected (accepted) practice, most women never know about the risk side, and never know that they have the option to decline. It's just part of what is done during pregnancy. But if you've ever had a baby inside you react negatively to the u/s, you know that they are in fact being impacted by it in some way - it's not a passive test.
Add into the above the fact that many machines are improperly maintained/calibrated, and there is no knowing what strength/dosage is being used, that many "techs" are not properly trained on the proper usage of the equipment, and that can cause a fair bit of concern for a mama. And if that mama would never act on the information received, why have the test and deal with that concern.
I always recommend a woman think about what she wants to learn from the u/s, what she is going to do with that information, and then do the risk/benefit analysis. In the case of the OP, if I personally were feeling concern, I might ask for a scan. But the fact is that I'm not the OP, she's the one that has to determine if her concerns are worth that to her.
Hopefully that answered your question.