Quote:
Originally Posted by
miblair 
I was negative when I was pregnant with my son, but tested positive when I took the test at 10 weeks during this pregnancy (I had to be tested because I had a CVS test). My doctor said I would have to do the IV of antibiotics during labor, because anytime anyone tests positive at any stage they treat them as GBS+. However, I have read that this depends greatly on your practitioner (doctor, midwife, etc), and of course your personal choice if you choose to go ahead with the antibiotics. Did you go ahead with the antibiotics for your last pregnancy when you were positive? If so, what was your experience? (hope I'm not hijacking your post!)
Hmm, that's pretty unreasonable to test you at 10 weeks and then say you'll need antibiotics. I mean, they test you late in pregnancy because status can totally change (and really, my understanding is that it can change even between 36 weeks and delivery, but they don't have a good rapid test they can do during labor). I'd definitely ask to be retested under your circumstances.
I did have antibiotics last time, and because my labor was sooooooo long, I had lots of doses! (They do it like every 4 hours!) It ended up not being a big deal - neither I nor baby had any adverse reactions or developed thrush/yeast problems, but if I'm GBS negative this time I would like to avoid any unnecessary disruption of my labor and I really don't want to mess up my happy healthy microbe community.
Follow Mothering