Well, ideally, the emphasis with young children would be on simple games and storytelling that is fundamentally and naturally more alive between the child and parent, as opposed to a written storyline coming from a book. There's a world of difference between me telling my daughter a story I have learned (or made up for her) and what happens when we simply sit together and read from a book. There are a lot of reasons I want to limit books at this age, frankly, and the main reasons are because I believe reading can wait, I would rather do more interactive things with her (like live storytelling) or let her do her own imaginative free-play. She's only 2, after all, and I would prefer her to grow, bloom, and unfold naturally, and I don't want to spend too much time feeding her from outside stimulation (like books). Without really knowing, I'm guessing these are the reasons I've never seen books in a Waldorf nursery or kindergarten classroom. I'm guessing the idea is that in those early years, children are better off without them.
Â
I think context is important. Of course it is wonderful to read to children, especially if the alternative in some households is TV or videogames. But I believe it is even better yet to do other interactive things with children, like singing with them, making up a story just for them, or telling a familiar fairy tale that has been learned by heart, especially when I think about toddlers.
Â
These are blasphemous ideas to be sure! And I should point out I'm talking about a particular approach that I believe in and want to implement in my family, and I believe based on my exposure to Waldorf education is consistent with Waldorf philosophy. Others may disagree, but that debate is not really the point of my post, I was looking for something to explain all this more eloquently than I can.  So, on that note, any resources?Â
Â
Babygirlsmama