To the best of my knowledge, even the highest-protein nut (the peanut) gets the majority of its calories from fat, not protein. However, when I visited my midwife for an analysis of my diet, she added up the protein in only some of the foods I ate. Obviously, she counted legumes, and she also counted nuts, though she didn't count any of the protein grams from my grains or vegetables. In the end, unsurprisingly given that she didn't include all of my food, she said I was low in protein and needed more nuts. Because I knew I didn't actually have to go by any of her recommendations, I didn't push the point, but aren't many grains and vegetables higher in protein (as a percentage of calories) than nuts? Well, this may be a redundant question, since I know they are. Is there some other reason to count the protein in nuts but not the protein in broccoli, pasta, etc.?
Â
I don't mean to imply that nuts might be bad to include in one's diet. I will continue to eat them as a source of fats, (in some cases) minerals, and taste, but I am wondering if they are a more important source of protein than I'd given them credit for.
Edited by MrsSlocombe - 1/2/12 at 12:55am








