Quote:
Originally Posted by
sunflwrmoonbeamÂ

I thought it had been clear from my original post, but I guess I need to spell it out explicitly.
Â
.... I don't want to stay one step ahead of her,Â
Well, to be fair, in your original post you did sayÂ
Â
Â
Quote:
Originally Posted byÂ
sunflwrmoonbeamÂ

I'm looking for resources to stay a few steps ahead of her.Â
Â
But anyway, I think we're not understanding each other. I'm pretty sure I know what you're asking. If addition is the "next thing" she should learn after counting, you want to have addition resources (books, games, manipulatives) ready for when she says "show me more about numbers, mama!"
Â
But I'm saying that things like numeracy and literacy foundations are best learned from life, conversation and open-ended play rather than educational games or manipulatives or books or what-have-you. I'm saying that if addition is the next thing she's wired to learn, and she's truly ready with all the prerequisite concepts, she'll just start noticing things in the real world and she'll start talking about how "four and then two more is six!" or asking "eight is bigger than seven, right, and so eighteen is bigger than seventeen too?" or "why is it called twelve and not two-teen?"Â
Â
To me child-led learning at age two is not about a child showing curiosity and the parent responding with the next bit of learning direction and resources. It's the child leading the actual learning with her questions and observations. If we get caught up in tangible skills like addition and go ahead and provide teaching in that direction, we run the risk of our child missing out on the less tangible learning that should actually precede that: the number sense, the appreciation of patterns, the inter-relationship of numbers and their manipulation, the understand of the "three-ness of three" and the lovely symmetry of eight. I would go so far as to say that if you have to figure out what she should learn next, she's not likely truly ready for it.Â
Â
Two of my kids began spontaneously reading as very young threes. Two were doing multiplication before age 4. I do understand precocious kids and the kind of drive to learn academic things that they can exhibit. I just think that it's important to leave it up to them what "the next thing" is. Life is packed full of basic pre-academic learning opportunities without the parent needing to provide education-related materials to guide things.
Â
Miranda