I would have probably looked like this
replied like this
and went home and did this
. lol Actually, I probably just would have said, thanks for your time, and walked out, because (IMO) that statement implies the principle obviously has no idea what he/she is dealing with.
I would probably try to gather some good resources on the learning styles of gifted children and try to provide the principle with them. I would then have a meeting and say something like....I know that conventionally a child needs XYZ, however it has been studied and observed that the needs of a Gifted child (which is NOT a "bright" child) are ABC, and if forced to follow the XYZ learning style, will actually cause a loss of interest, rebellion, and/or deceleration of learning.... (things that seem to already be taking place) I would really like to be able to keep my son in the school because he wants to be here, but we have to be able to reach a realistic understanding of the kind of child he is, and that he does have some different needs, so that we can compromise on how he can still participate in this school.
On a side note: What bothers me the most about the statement the principle made is "I DON'T CARE how BRIGHT (you are....)" My Father always said you can learn a lot about someone when you listen to the first 5 words they say...and I think this statement speaks volumes (unfortunately). Good Luck in whatever you decide to do.
Just my
. 
http://giftedkids.about.com/od/schoolissues/qt/inattentive.htm
"average children need nine to twelve repetitions of a new concept in order to learn it, bright children need six to eight repetitions, but gifted children can learn new concepts after only one or two repetitions."
Edited by Mom2010 - 2/10/12 at 2:55pm