or Connect
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Baby › Baby Health › Vaccinations › The case for vaccination
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The case for vaccination - Page 7  

post #121 of 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildKingdom View Post

what's your explanation for why autism keeps increasing, even though thimerosol has been removed?  

 

The latest CDC figure for autism--1 in 88, is from 8 year olds in 2008. So they were born in 2000, before thimerosal was removed.

 

But it will never be clear cut, even 10 years from now, because as thimerosal was being removed from most pediatric vaccines, the CDC began promoting flu shots (no preference for mercury free doses) to pregnant women and babies starting at 6 months. So the exposure to thimerosal began at an earlier age (as developing fetuses). In 2009 and 2010, many pregnant women got injected with 50 mcg mercury (25 mcg from the regular flu shot and 25 mcg from the H1N1 flu shot).

post #122 of 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louisw View Post

"No, chickenpox is not a particularly scary disease, but that does not mean it is not worth trying to prevent.  More than a hundred kids used to die a year from the disease - is that too few to bother trying to save?"

 

 

Yes it is if the cost of "saving" these 100 kids is the lives of 1000 other kids.

 

All invasive medicine is about RISK versus reward. The Vaccine Industry ignores most risk and over sells reward.

 

NOTHING is more invasive than injecting toxins into your body.

I thought this was an interesting read from a non-vax perspective on vaccine versus disease.

 

There seem to be a lot of reports to VAERS concerning chicken pox vaccines reactions.

 

http://www.nvic.org/nvic-archives/pressrelease/pressrelease9132000.aspx

post #123 of 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Reeves View Post

Taking the mercury out of many vaccines albeit slowly in 1999 was a move in the right direction, but still keeping 25 mcg of mercury in flu shots is crazily stupid. 

They did not actually begin in 1999. That's when they started thinking about it.

post #124 of 713

VAERS is self reported (reports are not compulsory) and reports are unverified. It is a very, very poor tool for judging the number of complaints. In addition there is no proof required. All you have to do is fill out a form. There's a famous incident of a VAERS report done as a stunt:

 

Quote:

The chief problem with the VAERS data is that reports can be entered by anyone and are not routinely verified. To demonstrate this, a few years ago I entered a report that an influenza vaccine had turned me into The Hulk. The report was accepted and entered into the database.

 

Because the reported adverse event was so… unusual, a representative of VAERS contacted me. After a discussion of the VAERS database and its limitations, they asked for my permission to delete the record, which I granted. If I had not agreed, the record would be there still, showing that any claim can become part of the database, no matter how outrageous or improbable.

 

In some cases, VAERS does show clusters, such as the intussusception following Rotashield (although there are questions about whether it was truly caused by the vaccine). However, groups also encourage people to report absolutely anything that occurs after vaccine administration to VAERS. Since these reports are not verified, we have no idea how many of the complaints were truly caused by vaccines.

post #125 of 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexisT View Post

VAERS is self reported (reports are not compulsory) and reports are unverified. It is a very, very poor tool for judging the number of complaints. In addition there is no proof required. All you have to do is fill out a form. 

 

 

I know this. I would still think high reports of one vaccine over another might have merit.  VAERS is not completely useless in my mind.  

 

Do you know of another tool for reporting vaccine reactions?

 

The CDC list of risks for the varicella vaccine was really lame.  It said  seizures and pneumonia were very rare reactions (two of the more severe reactions listed).  It would be nice to have some numbers so people can make a decision around vaxxing.

 

For what it is worth for any lurkers considering the vax, it seems safer to do varicella separately from MMR.

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/varicella.html


Edited by purslaine - 6/3/12 at 2:36pm
post #126 of 713
Thread Starter 
I think vaers is a good place to start. I would rather see too many reactions reported to vaers than not enough. Cupped with things like vsd I think we do a pretty good job monitoring vaccine safety (yes, I know several of you think that makes me insane).
post #127 of 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by kathymuggle View Post

Mine, too.  And I do not begrudge it - even the money that goes towards vaxxes wink1.gif  I like health care to be free even if I do not use it.

 

I am not sure why you mentioned education.  I am not sure what point you are trying to make.

 

You can follow the vaccine schedule if you want.  As a non-vaxxer, I do not really care if individuals choose to vax or not. I understand people can look at the same research and come to different conclusion for their family.   I care, deeply, that people do not feel forced to vax and that people can make an informed choice on the matter.  

 

Glad to explain! I was responding to a comment made earlier in the thread. Somebody said that people choose to vaccinate or not based on their own child's needs only, and that nobody takes the common good into consideration when they make their decision. I was just pointing out that it wasn't true: I was one of those people who considered society as a whole in deciding to vaccinate! The reason why I mentioned education and healthcare is because they were other examples where I think we sort of pool together resources for everyone's benefit.

post #128 of 713

Got it, Michelle.  Thanks for the clarification. smile.gif

post #129 of 713

Wildkingdom-

Please edit your post.  We do not allow namecalling. 

 

Anyone else who has quoted Wildkingdom, please go ahead and delete that out of your posts as well.

 

Please keep the disagreements respectful. 

post #130 of 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by QueenOfTheMeadow View Post

Wildkingdom-

Please edit your post.  We do not allow namecalling. 

 

Anyone else who has quoted Wildkingdom, please go ahead and delete that out of your posts as well.

 

Please keep the disagreements respectful. 

 

But it's OK for him to call Rachel a Pharma shill?  I'll be glad to edit if he has to, also.

post #131 of 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by ma2two View Post

 

The latest CDC figure for autism--1 in 88, is from 8 year olds in 2008. So they were born in 2000, before thimerosal was removed.

 

But it will never be clear cut, even 10 years from now, because as thimerosal was being removed from most pediatric vaccines, the CDC began promoting flu shots (no preference for mercury free doses) to pregnant women and babies starting at 6 months. So the exposure to thimerosal began at an earlier age (as developing fetuses). In 2009 and 2010, many pregnant women got injected with 50 mcg mercury (25 mcg from the regular flu shot and 25 mcg from the H1N1 flu shot).


And before the Tdap was the preferred form of tetanus booster for adults, almost every adult that got a tetanus booster got 25 mcg thimerasol as well, either from the TT or adult Td if they chose to get a booster every 10 years or they went to the ER with any wound that the doctors thought might be a tetanus risk.  This included pregnant and breastfeeding women.

post #132 of 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildKingdom View Post

 

But it's OK for him to call Rachel a Pharma shill?  I'll be glad to edit if he has to, also.

Missed that, thanks.  I was just responding to a report.  sigh.   What post specifically is that one in?  My head hurts and I don't think I can take a look through every single post for nastyness without going into a full blown migraine. 

 

Any name calling whatsoever needs to be edit out.  Everyone needs to read through their posts, and edit it out. 

 

It is possible to disagree and argue without accusations and calling people names.  The vaccination forums have become a den for nastiness, and it needs to stop.  If I were a new member looking for information on either side of this debate, I would have run screaming. 

post #133 of 713
Thread Starter 
The percentage of people that get a flue shot is very low and many pregnant women get the thimerosol free version. If the thimerosol is causing it there should still be a significant drop of.
post #134 of 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by QueenOfTheMeadow View Post

Missed that, thanks.  I was just responding to a report.  sigh.   What post specifically is that one in?  My head hurts and I don't think I can take a look through every single post for nastyness without going into a full blown migraine. 

 

Any name calling whatsoever needs to be edit out.  Everyone needs to read through their posts, and edit it out. 

 

It is possible to disagree and argue without accusations and calling people names.  The vaccination forums have become a den for nastiness, and it needs to stop.  If I were a new member looking for information on either side of this debate, I would have run screaming. 

 

It's in the post immediately before mine.  I quoted it.  He tells Rachel that she sounds like an anonymous pharma shill.  That's what I was responding to. 

post #135 of 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rrrrrachel View Post


If mercury in vaccines caused the "autism epidemic," why hasn't there been a drop in autism since it was taken out? 

I have directly answered this SEVERAL times, so I don't know why you keep pretending you don't understand.

 

First of all, thimerosal wasn't "taken out" of vaccines, as you put it.  Thimerosal-free, single-use-vial vaccines began to be manufactured in 2001 to replace the thimerosal-preserved pediatric vaccines.  The thimerosal-preserved pediatric vaccines continued to be distributed and used in the US for as long as the shelf life was good.  Many of us have reported that our pediatricians were still using them in 2004.

 

The current 1/88 rate of autism, as reported by the CDC, is based on children born in 2000, and diagnosed by 2008.  Those children would have received the more thimerosal-preserved vaccines than children ever studied before, because the thimerosal-free vaccines were not yet widely available in 2000 and 2001--which is when those children would have received most of their vaccines.

 

In addition, the flu shot began appearing on the recommended schedule for children starting in 2004--and the flu shots were NOT widely available in thimerosal-free form, nor did the CDC mandate thimerosal-free vaccines for children.  

 

Some doctors use adult vaccine formulations (i.e., thimerosal-preserved) for older children, as they are less expensive.

post #136 of 713
Thread Starter 
I already explained the flu shot thing I don't know why you're acting like you don't understand.
post #137 of 713
Taxi, even if thimerosol (sp?) vaxers were still being used, that doesn't mean that all children only received thimerosol vaccines. Peds probably used up what they had, and then started using the newer ones.
post #138 of 713
Rrrrrachael, you are dodging the fact that children born in 2000 DID receive thimerosal-preserved vaccines.

It is totally misleading to suggest that the 2012 autism rate should be lower due to discontinued use of thimerosal, when thimerosal had not yet been discontinued. Those children did NOT receive less thimerosal than children born in previous years.
post #139 of 713

I was under the impression that "thimerisol-free" is not actually completely free of it, just dramatically lowered.  

 

???????

post #140 of 713
Super-Single-Mama, thimerosal-free vaccines began being produced in 20001.

Vaccine manufacturers continued to sell and distribute pediatric multi-use vials, and pediatricians continued to use them, for as long as their shelf life allowed.

Our pediatrician was still using them in 2004.

As pediatric DTaP and HepB vaccines were reformulated without thimerosal, Prevnar, pneumococcal, varicella, and flu shots were added to the schedule4. Most flu shots contained thimerosal; FluMist, which never contained thimerosal, was contraindicated for children under30 3 and pregnant women. Most of the other vaccines on the schedule contain aluminum adjuvants.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Vaccinations
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Baby › Baby Health › Vaccinations › The case for vaccination