or Connect
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Mom › Women's Health  › Autism Protection Protocol
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Autism Protection Protocol - Page 7

post #121 of 141
Thread Starter 

"Thimerosal was never tested or approved by the FDA, yet it’s still allowed in vaccines. Eli Lilly said it was safe back in the 1930s and the medical community just accepted it. After the creation of the FDA, its use was simply continued."

 

http://www.ageofautism.com/2012/09/thalidomidethimerosal.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ageofautism+%28AGE+OF+AUTISM%29

 

Seems a little strange no?

 

How mercury destroys neurons

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VImCpWzXJ_w&feature=PlayList&p=904C35CAD065DB81&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=77

 

The "vaccination" big picture

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIFpbAxDMYI&feature=related


Edited by Louisw - 9/7/12 at 1:13pm
post #122 of 141
Thread Starter 

Support the Doctors Who Help Children With Autism

 

"While emerging scientific evidence has determined that children with autism have a higher incidence of immune dysregulation, gastrointestinal disease, mitochondrial dysfunction, and other complex health issues, many physicians are unaware of these underlying medical conditions and they can remain untreated."

 

http://www.ageofautism.com/2012/09/support-the-doctors-who-help-children-with-autism.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ageofautism+%28AGE+OF+AUTISM%29

 

I will attempt to address each of the above issues in turn.

post #123 of 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louisw View Post

 

Did our genome suddenly change in the mid 1980s when the "vaccination" wave hit?

 

 

Obviously you did not see or read my post.  We have the diaries of great great great grandparents in my family who CLEARLY had autism in some form or another.  I have studied mediaeval Irish law tracts which categorise "idiots" in legal terms (to state how such people should be cared for in the absence of other family and/or to describe in a census like way who lived where and what they did) which describe "those who circle upon toes and flap" as distinct from "those with prominent tongues and lumps beneath the neck".  It is very easy to find evidence of the existence of autism for the last 1200 years at least.

post #124 of 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoBecGo View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Louisw View Post

 

Did our genome suddenly change in the mid 1980s when the "vaccination" wave hit?

 

 

Obviously you did not see or read my post.  We have the diaries of great great great grandparents in my family who CLEARLY had autism in some form or another.  I have studied mediaeval Irish law tracts which categorise "idiots" in legal terms (to state how such people should be cared for in the absence of other family and/or to describe in a census like way who lived where and what they did) which describe "those who circle upon toes and flap" as distinct from "those with prominent tongues and lumps beneath the neck".  It is very easy to find evidence of the existence of autism for the last 1200 years at least.

 

Autism as modern medical science defines it, is a menu of behaviors that has been determined by a group of psychiatrists and published in a book. You cannot diagnose your ancestors or medieval village idiots with autism, so therefore make the claim it is genetic. You could make a case for the existence of the neurological damaged caused by encephalitis or SSPE going back 1200 years and beyond (which obviously it did and neither of which are "genetic"), but not "autism". The censuses also could have been describing those with Down Syndrome. There is also the legitimate diagnosis of mercury poisoning, aka Mad Hatters Disease.

post #125 of 141
Thread Starter 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Louisw View Post

 

Support the Doctors Who Help Children With Autism

 

"While emerging scientific evidence has determined that children with autism have a higher incidence of immune dysregulation, gastrointestinal disease, mitochondrial dysfunction, and other complex health issues, many physicians are unaware of these underlying medical conditions and they can remain untreated."

 

http://www.ageofautism.com/2012/09/support-the-doctors-who-help-children-with-autism.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ageofautism+%28AGE+OF+AUTISM%29

 

Let's look at immune dysregulation.

 

80% of our immune systems are located in our intestinal tracts. When you take an "antibiotic" you destroy the life in your intestinal tract and thus your immune system. Antibiotics were created for life threatening emergencies to pass them out for earaches and sore throats is a very bad thing IMO.

 

Your Gut Biotics are part of YOU

 

“Normal people generally have some cancer cells, Candida yeast, E. coli, staphylococcus, strep, and any number of other potentially bad organisms you can think of in their tract most of the time. But they don't get any disease. ... E. coli is actually a probiotic when held in check by normal friendly flora. It's only when the friendly probiotic bacteria get killed off that the potentially bad organisms get a chance to get a foothold and take over.” The Doctor Within

 

"Also lactobacillus found in the colon and vagina produce hydrogen peroxide. This destroys harmful bacteria and viruses, preventing colon disease, vaginitis, bladder infections and a host of other common ailments. When lactobacillus in the colon or vaginal tract have been overrun effective douche or enema solution can be made using 3 tablespoons of 3% H202 in 1 quart of distilled water. Keep in mind, however, that a good bacterial flora must always be re-established in theses areas to achieve lasting results.”   Doctor David Williams MD

 

"Friendly bacteria are a significant part of the primary defenses in all the vulnerable open areas of our body where their friendly biofilm protects us from countless pathogens. This is especially true in the gastrointestinal  and female genital tracts but it holds for the nose and upper respiratory tract as well."   Doctor Lon Jones D.O.

 

"We should consider not how to kill microorganisms but rather how to make them our friends and allies;  how to use them in ways that encourage their proliferation in out foods."   Claude Aubert

    

Drug Antibiotics wipe out your intestinal flora, the good bacteria that your body uses for MANY functions, including the production of many vitamins. Killing these friendly bacteria as Drug Antibiotics do has MANY negative effects on your health. IMO do not take Drug Antibiotics UNLESS your doctor can make a good case that your life will be in jeopardy without them. First try the natural antibiotics listed below. These natural substances DO NOT kill your intestinal flora. Keeping a high level of natural antibiotics circulating in your blood stream will help protect you against any bacterium you may encounter. You MUST research this enough to realize the IMMENSE long-term harm Drug Antibiotics can cause you. When taking Drug Antibiotics you MUST also concurrently take probiotics. Take the pro-life probiotics three hours or so apart from the killer toxic drug antibiotics.

 

Middle Ear Infections

 

“90% of upper respiratory infections, including children's ear infections, are viral, and antibiotics don't treat viral infection. More than 40% of about 50 million prescriptions for antibiotics each year in physicians' offices were inappropriate."   CDC

 

“I have treated many hundreds perhaps thousands of cases of ear infections with echinacea and I know it works. I rarely have to give antibiotics or use tubes to clear up these infections.”    Doctor Jay Gordon, Pediatrician Cedars Sinai MC

 

"The best way to prevent allergy in infants is to breast feed them. Children who are allergic to foods often have fluids in the ear tube leading to infections."     Prevention

 

“80 out of 100 children, if given only medication to reduce pain or fever, would recover from an acute ear infection within a few days. If they were given antibiotics instead, the number would rise only to 92 -- and 3 to 10 of the children would develop a rash, while 5 to 10 would develop diarrhea.”   Journal of the American Medical Association November 17, 2010; 304(19):2161-2169 , Note if you forget the “medication” and allow the fever you will see even better results IMO How to treat ear infections Doctor Mercola

 

"We found in our clinical practice an over 90% reduction in middle ear problems with the kids using xylitol for their teeth."   Doctor Lon Jones D.O. Note Doctor Jones also had good results using xylitol with colds, allergies, ear infections, sinus infections and dental health.

 

"I hope with the publication of this book more pediatricians will get their earache patients using xylitol."   Doctor Lon Jones D.O.

 

Giving a child Drug Antibiotics for a middle ear infection is almost never a good idea. Anti-biotics are vastly over prescribed presumably to induce the placebo effect in the paying stiff. Fine, use SUGAR PILLS, please. Believe it or not Drug Anti-biotics are STILL given for viruses. But please don’t YOU be so foolish as to accept this insane “Prescription”.

 

IMO much of middle ear problems in children are due to the; "Vaccination", infection, antibiotics, "vaccination" CYCLE our kids are CONSTANTLY subjected to.  The "vaccination" and antibiotics part of this cycle have a trivial solution.

post #126 of 141

If we are discussing potential environmental causes of autism, I would like to add anti-depressants:

 

"A second article, also released early on the journal’s Web site, found an elevated risk of autism in children whose mothers took a popular type of antidepressant during the year before delivery. But the authors reassured women taking these drugs — so-called S.S.R.I.’s like ProzacZoloftCelexa and Lexapro — that the risk was still quite low: 2.1 percent in children whose mothers used them in the year before delivery, and 2.3 percent in the first trimester of pregnancy.    "http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/05/health/research/05autism.html

post #127 of 141
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoBecGo View Post
It is very easy to find evidence of the existence of autism for the last 1200 years at least.

 

Our genome has not changed one iota in the last 1200 years.

 

What the public has not been told is there is a whole new SCIENCE which has been aborn in the last 20 or so years.

 

"In his book, The Biology of Belief, Doctor Lipton explains the foundation of epigenetics, and how the true secret to life does not lie within your DNA, but rather within the mechanisms of the cell membrane. it is actually the cell’s membrane -- operating in response to environmental signals picked up by the membrane’s receptors -- that control the “reading” of the genes inside. ... because we have to take back a belief that we have power over our lives. Because our current perception is that we are victims, and since perceptions control life, if you believe you are a victim, you become a victim. When we change our perception."

 

"Epigenetics is unraveling a continuous cross talk between our genetic profile and the environment. Indeed, genome is much more “flexible” than previously thought and such flexibility underscores the relevance of “good eating” for maintenance of good health. Future nutritionists will have to face the challenge of elucidating the mechanism of nutrition-induced epigenetic changes during pre and post-natal life, to optimize nutritional interventions in a “personalized” perspective.”   Genes & Nutrition

 

Our Static Genome Has a Dynamic Expression 

 

“The good news ... is that ‘HDAC inhibitors’ can stop this degenerative process, and some of them have already been identified in common foods. Examples include sulforaphane in broccoli, indole-3-carbinol in cruciferous vegetables, and organosulfur compounds in vegetables like garlic and onions.”   Eurekalert April 28, 2010, Note the common element SULFUR IMO make sure  your take some MSM often

 

"You are in control of your genes … and are changing them often -- daily and perhaps even hourly -- based on the foods you eat, the air you breathe, and the thoughts you think. It’s your environment and lifestyle that dictates your tendency to express disease, and this new realization is set to make major waves in the future of disease prevention -- including one day educating people on how to fight disease at the epigenetic level.”   Doctor Joseph Mercola MD

 

"One of the most cutting-edge fields of medicine is epigenetics, which has shown that your lifestyle plays a significant role in how your genes are expressed. The widely accepted dogma that your genes control your health destiny is now being completely uprooted, as your genetic code is not set in stone. Rather it is constantly changing based on factors like your diet and stress levels.”     Doctor Joseph Mercola MD

 

“Eating broccoli and other cruciferous vegetables, garlic and onions helps to activate tumor suppressor genes that fight cancer. Likewise, researchers revealed that drinking a probiotic-rich beverage influenced the activity of hundreds of your genes in a positive manner. To put it simply, the more dietary and lifestyle habits you engage in that positively influence your genetic expression, the more protection you’ll naturally receive against a host of chronic illnesses.”     Doctor Joseph Mercola MD  

 

The new field of epigenetics is rapidly revealing how people, plants and animals do start with a certain genetic code at conception. But, the choice of which genes are "expressed," or activated, is strongly affected by environmental influences. The expression of genes can change quite rapidly over time, they can be influenced by external factors, those changes can be passed along to offspring, and they can literally hold the key to life and death.

 

Please study this a little and you will realize   AUTISM = ENVIRONMENT

 

Please study this a little and you will realize   CVD = ENVIRONMENT

 

Please study this a little and you will realize   CANCER = ENVIRONMENT

 

Please study this a little and you will realize   DISEASE = ENVIRONMENT

post #128 of 141
Thread Starter 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Louisw View Post

 

Please study this a little and you will realize   AUTISM = ENVIRONMENT

 

"Is this -- the truth about autism, the reality that so many parents and even doctors know, yet so many "experts" and regulators deny -- too down-in-the-weeds, too delicate, too darn complicated to expect the candidates to face? Are pabulum and platitudes OK?"

 

http://www.ageofautism.com/2012/09/age-of-autism-weekly-wrap-which-candidate-will-cause-less-autism.html

 

NIH just gave another "autism grant"  100 million dollars

 

95% to look at genetic causes

 

5% to look at environmental causes

 

They would have gladly  gone 100% NOTHING but I guess that might look bad.

 

NIH is tasked NOT TO FIND the CAUSES of Autism

post #129 of 141
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louisw View Post

 

NIH just gave another "autism grant"  100 million dollars

 

95% to look at genetic causes

 

5% to look at environmental causes

 

Are you telling me our NIH does not know that our STATIC genome has a DYNAMIC expression that is almost totally dependent on ENVIRONMENTAL factors?

 

Of course they KNOW.

 

NIH has MANY decades of experience in not finding a decent cure for cancer by LOOKING in the WRONG places.

 

"There is not one but many cures for cancer available. But they are all being suppressed by the ACS, the NCI and the major oncology centers. They have too much interest in the status quo." Doctor Robert Atkins MD, Note you will soon know many of these cures and more importantly you will know WHY they can work so effectively on cancer

 

"Despite more than 2.4 million papers published on cancer research to date conventional medicine has largely failed to identify safe low-cost effective methods of cancer intervention and prevention."   Life Extension, Note this is not possible Folks. Cancer is being used as a means of depopulation. The problem is not with the good people working in the cancer vineyards; it is with our political hierarchy centered in the Rockefeller controlled HHS

post #130 of 141
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louisw View Post

NIH has MANY decades of experience in not finding a decent cure for AUTISM by LOOKING in the WRONG places.

 

So who will find the cause and cure for most of autism?

 

You mothers, YOU, and no one else.

 

Please share your knowledge.

post #131 of 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoBecGo View Post

 

Obviously you did not see or read my post.  We have the diaries of great great great grandparents in my family who CLEARLY had autism in some form or another.  I have studied mediaeval Irish law tracts which categorise "idiots" in legal terms (to state how such people should be cared for in the absence of other family and/or to describe in a census like way who lived where and what they did) which describe "those who circle upon toes and flap" as distinct from "those with prominent tongues and lumps beneath the neck".  It is very easy to find evidence of the existence of autism for the last 1200 years at least.

There are no genetic epidemics.

 

Many mainstreams scientists believe there has been a genuine spike in autism numbers (not just better or shifting diagnosis).

 

Saying "my family tree has a lot of autism in it" or "we can see evidence of autism going back in history" does not mean there aren't current environmental reasons for the serious spike.

post #132 of 141

GoBecGo-

Your post has been removed.   We do not allow personal attacks.  If you post in this manner again, your access to this thread will be removed.

post #133 of 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louisw View Post

 

So who will find the cause and cure for most of autism?

 

You mothers, YOU, and no one else.

 

Please share your knowledge.

My dh is equally responsible for my children's health.  Your posting comes across as leaving the responsibility for all the ills of children on their mothers.  I think you should rethink your phrasing. 

post #134 of 141
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by QueenOfTheMeadow View Post

My dh is equally responsible for my children's health.  Your posting comes across as leaving the responsibility for all the ills of children on their mothers.  I think you should rethink your phrasing. 

 

IMO if we depended on husbands, AS A RULE, for our kids health we might be very sorry. I am a husband. Congratulations on your good luck.

 

I do think that mothers bear PRIMARY responsibility for their children. We husbands can certainly HELP.

post #135 of 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louisw View Post

 

IMO if we depended on husbands, AS A RULE, for our kids health we might be very sorry. I am a husband. Congratulations on your good luck.

 

I do think that mothers bear PRIMARY responsibility for their children. We husbands can certainly HELP.

 

If you don't or won't personally take responsibility for the health of YOUR children, how are we to find you either credible or sincere?


Edited by MeepyCat - 9/12/12 at 8:29am
post #136 of 141

Meepcat-

Please edit your post so it's not a personal attack. 

post #137 of 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louisw View Post

 

IMO if we depended on husbands, AS A RULE, for our kids health we might be very sorry. I am a husband. Congratulations on your good luck.

 

I do think that mothers bear PRIMARY responsibility for their children. We husbands can certainly HELP.

I'm not lucky.  I married a man who I knew wanted to do more than just help.  I married a man who wanted to PARENT.  I think that as a culture, we all need to be involved in our children's health, especially parents.  I think when you undervalue the role of fathering, than you do a diservice to children. 

post #138 of 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louisw View Post

 

IMO if we depended on husbands, AS A RULE, for our kids health we might be very sorry. I am a husband. Congratulations on your good luck.

 

I do think that mothers bear PRIMARY responsibility for their children. We husbands can certainly HELP.

I think both parents are 100% responsible for the health of their children.  

 

That being said, any environmental links between autism and environment probably happen during pregnancy and early life.  The mother is ultimately responsible for her health in pregnancy, and, traditionally (perhaps because the mother is often home more during early infancy) early infancy.

 

I think Louis could have chosen more inclusive words, but I do agree that change and definitely responsibility lie in the hands of parents and not corporations.

post #139 of 141
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MeepyCat View Post

 

If you don't or won't personally take responsibility for the health of YOUR children, how are we to find you either credible or sincere?

 

Is that what you read in my statements?

 

If so you read incorrectly.

 

Although you are largely functionally correct. My kids are grown adults with kids of their own. To their credit they almost never "vaccinate". So I may have helped.

post #140 of 141
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by QueenOfTheMeadow View Post

I'm not lucky.  I married a man who I knew wanted to do more than just help.  I married a man who wanted to PARENT. 

 

Suppose you and your husband had gotten a divorce at 30 years of age. Who would the Judge have awarded PRIMARY custody your children 9 out of 10 times?

 

Why?

 

Because Judges are WISE people.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Women's Health
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Mom › Women's Health  › Autism Protection Protocol