This might be difficult. Let's see if we can compile a list of sources that both sides feel are valid. (For the purposes of the debate threads only - you are free to link to whatever the heck you want (with the exception of whale.to) on all the rest of the threads)
Let's set down some ground rules:
*Offer up links to those sites/sources you consider valid (Please remember no whale.to links!)
*All sources will be considered - at first. But you will have to counter folks claims of bias/irrelevance/inaccuracy to keep them on the list
*You have to post something other than a one liner about another poster's source. You cannot post "that site is biased", or "That site is perfect." without some further discussion of why, preferably including examples.
*Once a site has been confirmed I will add it to the OP, so we have a running list of sites that both sides of the debate feel are useful.
*No name calling, no dismissive language, no discussing other posters.
If you can't participate accordingly, I reserve the right to lock you out of the thread. So choose your words carefully, be respectful no matter how much you disagree, and reread everything you post prior to posting it.