Mothering › Mothering Discussion Forums › Health › Vaccinations › Its not just a personal choice
New Posts  All Forums:
 

Its not just a personal choice - Page 14

post #261 of 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by humanati View Post

Hang on, I don't understand why my post drawing attention to the tactics & presence of pHARMa sock puppets & shills on this thread was deleted?

 

Can someone explain please?

 

In the first place the shilling for the Vaccination Industry is mostly so obvious there is NO NEED to point it out. Perhaps more importantly the monitors here do a GOOD job of minimizing ad hominem attacks which is good for us all and thirdly shills are people too and deserve a little respect.

 

All and all this system works well once you adjust to it.

post #262 of 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by marsupial-mom View Post


Analogy: over 99% of the time people drive they arrive at their destination safely. We wear seat belts and use carseats for the rest of the time.
Vaccines are similar.

 

Lets employ this analogy for the "polio vaccine"

 

The "polio vaccine" did not get rid of any of the disease caused by the wild polio virus, the Medical Industry merely renamed the results of polio to cover up the disastrous failure of various "polio vaccines", This is analogous to putting the seat belt on a dummy in the car. All the damage from the wild polio virus will still occur to the people in the car.

 

The "polio vaccine" introduced the cancer causing SV-40 virus into hundreds of millions of people. This is analogous to forcing the car to drive on the wrong side of the road at random times.

 

So in the case of the "polio vaccine" we have a seat belt that saves NO ONE and kills MANY and will probably continue to kill those now unborn long after the seat belt has been thrown away in total disgust..

 

http://vaxtruth.org/2012/03/the-polio-vaccine-part-1-2/

post #263 of 264
Quote:
So in the case of the "polio vaccine" we have a seat belt that saves NO ONE and kills MANY and will probably continue to kill those now unborn long after the seat belt has been thrown away in total disgust..

thumb.gif

post #264 of 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marnica View Post

  I believe those numbers come from the CDC

 

"Up to 95% of all polio infections are inapparent or asymptomatic"

Fewer than 1% of all polio infections result in flaccid paralysis

Approximately 4%–8% of polio infections consist of a minor, nonspecific illness without clinical or laboratory evidence of central nervous system invasion.

 

Here is the starting point for our problem with polio.

 

Here is the end point: A minimum of death or serious consequences from the wild polio virus. NO death or serious consequences from the "polio vaccine"

 

From the above data we see about 5% of us have problems expeditiously defeating the wild polio virus from our bodies.

 

Does this 5% also have trouble expeditiously defeating other viruses which currently, and in the future will, "require" a "vaccine solution"?

 

Are you telling me the CDC and Industrial Medicine cannot develop a simple test to identify these 5%?

 

Are you telling me the CDC and Industrial Medicine does not KNOW that high levels of vitamin D helps expeditiously defeat all viruses as well as all bacteria?

 

Since we get 90% of our vitamin D from the sun,  why does the CDC and Industrial Medicine tell us to stay the hell out of the SUN?

 

Numerous clinical testing has demonstrated IMO that we all (adults) require about 8,000 IU of vitamin D/day to show a  robust immune response so why does the CDC et al say we only require 400 IU/day of vitamin D?

 

Are you telling me the CDC and Industrial Medicine does not KNOW that high levels of vitamin C helps expeditiously defeat all viruses as well as all bacteria?

 

Numerous clinical testing has demonstrated IMO that we all require about 3 grams of vitamin C/day to show a  robust immune response so why does the CDC et al say we only require 60 mg/day of vitamin C?

 

We have a problem with polio and other viruses folks but it does not lay with the wild virus; it lies with the CDC, Industrial Medicine and our own poor knowledge of how to equip our bodies to fight ALL viruses..

 

"Doctor Thomas Levy, who has provided the definitive proof in his book ‘ Vitamin C, Infectious Diseases and Toxins: Curing the Incurable’. He is one of the world’s experts in effects of vitamin C on viruses. Here’s what he says “I have not found any flu virus for which vitamin C does not exert a virucidal effect, as long as enough vitamin C reaches the virus, such as in any acute infection. Vitamin C is virtually devoid of negative side effects.”  Patrick  Holford

 

"Since 1970, with teaching the bowel tolerance method of determining proper ascorbic acid doses to patients, I have not had to hospitalize a single patient for an acute viral disease or a complication from such a disease if the patient utilized the method. In some cases, such as with three cases of viral pneumonia, it was necessary to utilize intravenous ascorbate. Admittedly, I have been lucky because no patient has arrived with such severe symptoms as to necessitate immediate hospitalization. There have been many patients where there was no question that they would have required hospitalization in a very short period of time had not ascorbate been administered."   Doctor Robert Cathcart MD

 

"A group of scientists from UCLA published a remarkable paper in the prestigious journal, Nature. The UCLA group confirmed two other recent studies, showing that a naturally occurring steroid hormone - a hormone most of us take for granted - was, in effect, a potent antibiotic. Instead of directly killing bacteria and viruses, the steroid hormone under question increases the body's production of a remarkable class of proteins, called antimicrobial peptides. The 200 known antimicrobial peptides directly and rapidly destroy the cell walls of bacteria, fungi, and viruses, including the influenza virus, and play a key role in keeping the lungs free of infection. The steroid hormone that showed these remarkable antibiotic properties was plain old vitamin D."  Doctor John Cannell MD

 

"I am very optimistic about the potential of dietary selenium as a broad-spectrum chemoprotectant against various viral diseases. A lot of that may be entirely due to the immune-stimulating and antioxidant benefits of selenium, but I think that in a number of viral diseases, some degree of direct interaction between the virus and selenium is likely to be involved. We already have quite a few viral diseases where a clinical correlation or definite selenium benefit has been established: hepatitis B/liver disease, HIV/AIDS, Coxsackie virus/Keshan disease, hemorrhagic fever, MMTV/cancer, and a number of other animal viral diseases where selenium has been used in veterinary practice. I also strongly suspect that various herpes viruses will prove responsive to selenium therapy, and the strongest case of a selenoprotein in a virus to date is in a pox virus. So the potential scope of this chemoprotection approach is very exciting."   Doctor Will Taylor PhD, University of Georgia

 

It has been shown that without selenium viruses will replicate rapidly thus selenium is vitally important to fight a virus 500 mcg/day is not too much for a few days. Most viruses enter your body thru your ear canal. Half an eyedropper of 3% H2O2 in both ears, one at a time, for about five minutes will kill many of them. A nasal spray made with Xylitol or sea salt water will destroy viruses in your nose and upper lungs. Make sure your potassium levels are good.  I find by January I need to top up my vitamin D. Often 20,000 or 50,000 IU of vitamin D3 for a day or two will clear up my sniffles all by itself.


Edited by Louisw - 8/25/12 at 10:05am
New Posts  All Forums:
 
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Vaccinations
Mothering › Mothering Discussion Forums › Health › Vaccinations › Its not just a personal choice